It was only for white kids anyway...

Quote :

See, that is self-moderation.

Yeah, it's our fault he's repeatedly sexually harassed a group of us. We were asking for it, what with our femininity and all.

:|

C'mon, Nil, I know who you're referring to but what the fuck. I was on Skype that night when he out of fucking nowhere posted a picture of someone's house using their address and google maps and I've show how easy it is to get a shit ton of information about people without their consent or knowledge. Not to mention him repeatedly bringing minors to this board.

Ignoring sexually harassment is always the wrong move and reporting it to a higher up is supposed to fix the issue and not just give us a shrug and an "oh well".

I hate to keep bringing him up, but you banned slimredninja for far, far less.

Hot Cancer wrote:

can't just kick on the basis of our impressions that Unbrained is being creepier and more genuine is comments than someone else is or might be in the future.

First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me.

Speak out against moderation on silly fanfic forums today.

Lysander wrote:

Hot Cancer wrote:

can't just kick on the basis of our impressions that Unbrained is being creepier and more genuine is comments than someone else is or might be in the future.

First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me.

Speak out against moderation on silly fanfic forums today.

Yes, heaven forbid I could understand Nil wanting to set some level of consistency when he boots Unbrained. Because it's not like someone without the mental capacity to comprehend the differences between Unbrained's creepiness and regular M3333Ness (or the stuff VileCorp comes out with) would come along later and say "BUT YOU BANNED SKILLET!" when someone hurt their precious feelings, and it might be an idea to have completely black and white reasons to illustrate to the eternally stupid with diagrams.

I must be completely off my rocker and imagining fascists everywhere for that, musn't I?

Imbecile.

Ladies and gentlemen, our first ban of a regular poster.

All that defence of your position for nothing Nil. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Oh well, as I said in chat, it's an understandable decision:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
(Oh, and in before some genius accusses Nil of caving into pressure.)

Good riddance, sweet prince.

I wonder how long it will take unskilled to create a sock puppet and whine about his banning? (Because, Lord knows, no one ever seems to understand the message: "Your behavior is unacceptable. Go away and stay there.")

Ghost in the Machine wrote:

I wonder how long it will take unskilled to create a sock puppet and whine about his banning? (Because, Lord knows, no one ever seems to understand the message: "Your behavior is unacceptable. Go away and stay there.")

Probably not too long, but crucially, probably longer than it will take for Nil to ban the sockpuppet. In such matters, the banned user always loses.

Gah, I composed a great big wanky response for naught.

Hot C., no official rule was ever decided upon. Since you feel so strongly about it, maybe you should try proposing one. Write out what you think the rule should say, and we'll see if it meets with everyone's approval.

Oh Skillet. How it took you this long to get your ignorant creepy ass banned, I'll never know.

Lysander wrote:

Gah, I composed a great big wanky response for naught.

Hot C., no official rule was ever decided upon. Since you feel so strongly about it, maybe you should try proposing one. Write out what you think the rule should say, and we'll see if it meets with everyone's approval.

I feel less strongly about it than you think, it was however necessary that it be noted and things aren't always as simple as "yeah, everyone agrees this guy's been a fucknugget, ban!". And for future reference, a simpler, more valid, retort to me would've been "so why should we cater for total morons when making rules?". Don't thank me for the service. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Also, good suggestion, but I'm not that good at putting stuff down in such clear and concise language, so I'll probably pass. Plus I didn't see all of what Unbrained did, and I don't want to go asking people.

Somath Cegem wrote:

Simple because although he's the poster child for border line rapests and has committed some form of Cyberstalking ...., no fucker wants to be the one to drop the axe.

I know it's a moot point now, but doesn't the only axe in the forum belong to Nihilist anyway?

Mafi wrote:

I hate to keep bringing him up, but you banned slimredninja for far, far less.

Nihilist banned SRN for breaking posted rules (no spamming). Nihilist banned Skillet because he bothered you.

On GAFF, I'm pretty sure one of the Ten Suggestions was to NOT post "docs" of other people. I can't recall anyone getting banned for it. Though I also can't recall anyone actually DOING it. Maybe Nihilist should make a rule about it and then ban you for doing it? After all, we don't have a rule about retro-active bannings. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

Mafi wrote:

I hate to keep bringing him up, but you banned slimredninja for far, far less.

Nihilist banned SRN for breaking posted rules (no spamming). Nihilist banned Skillet because he bothered you.

On GAFF, I'm pretty sure one of the Ten Suggestions was to NOT post "docs" of other people. I can't recall anyone getting banned for it. Though I also can't recall anyone actually DOING it. Maybe Nihilist should make a rule about it and then ban you for doing it? After all, we don't have a rule about retro-active bannings. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Sure w/e.
Edit: harassment's harassment I suppose.

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

Maybe Nihilist should make a rule about it and then ban you for doing it?

Then get back to your /b/org cube and lay low before you end up vaporized like your friend and fellow /b/org unskilled78.

Nihilist wrote:

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

Maybe Nihilist should make a rule about it and then ban you for doing it?

Then get back to your /b/org cube and lay low before you end up vaporized like your friend and fellow /b/org unskilled78.

What is a /b/org and what makes you think Skillet had ever been on /b/?

You know, besides the complete social ineptness.

Wow, Michael, you managed to not post about what fat fucks we all are for once. I'm impressed.

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

Nihilist wrote:

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

Maybe Nihilist should make a rule about it and then ban you for doing it?

Then get back to your /b/org cube and lay low before you end up vaporized like your friend and fellow /b/org unskilled78.

What is a /b/org and what makes you think Skillet had ever been on /b/?

You know, besides the complete social ineptness.

Well, all he did to be even remotely funny was spout memes like crazy.

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

Stuff

In Mikey's mind, that post equals:

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Reality:

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Nihilist, you are seriously the best. Thank you so much for listening. I can deal with the little fucker personally, as uncomfortable as he makes me, but the more information that came out on him harassing my friends, the angrier I got. I'll sleep much better knowing that he isn't being horribly inappropriate towards people I care about.

LET'S CELEBRATE WITH A KITTEN MACRO PARTY

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

oh God oh God wrong file wrong file ABORT ABORT

Hot Cancer wrote:

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

Stuff

In Mikey's mind, that post equals:

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Reality:

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Best. Post. Ever.

Mr.Doobie wrote:

Mystique wrote:

Mr.Doobie wrote:

ZoZo wrote:

Except that wasn't how it happened, exactly...

People should've figured this out the moment they saw it was Unskilled who made this thread.

I'm soooo out of the loop on who is a dumbass these days.

Ah, he bopped around a bit on the House, but he didn't really gain much of a reputation until he got here. Basically, imagine Mikey except with less sports and all of Chris91's humorlessness.

My sense of humor is just fine, thanks.

Now, if we could get away from the Unskilled78 drama for two minutes and return to the original topic, I have to agree with Mae Bedlam: Berkeley's decision to cut the science lab is insane. In fact it's beyond insane....it's psychopathic. These blockheads are basically sabotaging their kids' futures for the sake of saving a few cents on next year's school budget.

Quote :

My sense of humor is just fine, thanks.

Haha, that is funny!

Quote :

In fact it's beyond insane....it's
psychopathic. These blockheads are basically sabotaging their kids'
futures for the sake of saving a few cents on next year's school budget.

You are an idiot.