Soldiers ordered not to drink beer for part of ANZAC Day, turn to whine instead

Reidmar wrote:

grmblfjx wrote:

...I kinda wouldn't be quite so full of myself if I were either of you.

As far as I'm concerned, which I'm not, Grumbles and possibly Cris are about the only two posters on this board that refrain from moderate/heavy poking of the daily squealer. And/or antagonizing other posters. Though I do feel the need to point out gumball acts pretty high and mighty while refraining from poking anyone, just my two cents

Uh...

If you think that Chris isn't antagonizing Clopper, it's only because Chris is really bad at antagonizing Clopper. He attempts to antagonize Clopper on a regular basis.

Chris pokes at Clopper, or at least tries because he's not the newest easily-offended delicate lily on the block and he just wants to show how tough, dedicated, and how far he has come from defending his e-honor, to seemingly defending and conflating himself with the forum as a whole.

Disco Stu wrote:

Chris pokes at Clopper, or at least tries because he's not the newest easily-offended delicate lily on the block and he just wants to show how tough, dedicated, and how far he has come from defending his e-honor, to seemingly defending and conflating himself with the forum as a whole.

Excuse me while I go bust a lung and herniate a disc from laughing so hard my face turns blue.

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

Reidmar wrote:

grmblfjx wrote:

...I kinda wouldn't be quite so full of myself if I were either of you.

As far as I'm concerned, which I'm not, Grumbles and possibly Cris are about the only two posters on this board that refrain from moderate/heavy poking of the daily squealer. And/or antagonizing other posters. Though I do feel the need to point out gumball acts pretty high and mighty while refraining from poking anyone, just my two cents

Uh...

If you think that Chris isn't antagonizing Clopper, it's only because Chris is really bad at antagonizing Clopper. He attempts to antagonize Clopper on a regular basis.

Mikey, look to the left. Check out my name. There's a a Jay and then slash, and right behind that? That's right. Cris generally doesn't mean Chris.

Jay/Cris wrote:

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

Reidmar wrote:

grmblfjx wrote:

...I kinda wouldn't be quite so full of myself if I were either of you.

As far as I'm concerned, which I'm not, Grumbles and possibly Cris are about the only two posters on this board that refrain from moderate/heavy poking of the daily squealer. And/or antagonizing other posters. Though I do feel the need to point out gumball acts pretty high and mighty while refraining from poking anyone, just my two cents

Uh...

If you think that Chris isn't antagonizing Clopper, it's only because Chris is really bad at antagonizing Clopper. He attempts to antagonize Clopper on a regular basis.

Mikey, look to the left. Check out my name. There's a a Jay and then slash, and right behind that? That's right. Cris generally doesn't mean Chris.

Thank you for pointing this out.

Now explain to me what sort of clown calls you Cris.

Jay/Cris wrote:

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

Reidmar wrote:

grmblfjx wrote:

...I kinda wouldn't be quite so full of myself if I were either of you.

As far as I'm concerned, which I'm not, Grumbles and possibly Cris are about the only two posters on this board that refrain from moderate/heavy poking of the daily squealer. And/or antagonizing other posters. Though I do feel the need to point out gumball acts pretty high and mighty while refraining from poking anyone, just my two cents

Uh...

If you think that Chris isn't antagonizing Clopper, it's only because Chris is really bad at antagonizing Clopper. He attempts to antagonize Clopper on a regular basis.

Mikey, look to the left. Check out my name. There's a a Jay and then slash, and right behind that? That's right. Cris generally doesn't mean Chris.

It's not Mikey's fault you have a stupid handle, Crispy. Besides, you and Chris are so similar (in ways other than name) that I sometimes wonder if there's a bit of sockpuppetry going on.

xerrofoot wrote:

It's not Mikey's fault you have a stupid handle, Crispy.

Nope. Tried that one. Doesn't bother him in the least. Try again.

xerrofoot wrote:

Besides, you and Chris are so similar (in ways other than name) that I sometimes wonder if there's a bit of sockpuppetry going on.

Hee. Oh my god, you have penetrated my obscenely clever ruse! Cris and Chris, how come nobody else saw it first? God, you're such a clever little Aussie.

But no. I'm the sarcastic and condescending asshole who likes bitching about queer issues and playing the angel's advocate, Chris s the poster with a short temper who posts these one-liners that generally consist out of fill in the blacks that resort to Godwin and/or rape. Yes?

I've provoked discussion! My job is done.

Jay/Cris wrote:

xerrofoot wrote:

Besides, you and Chris are so similar (in ways other than name) that I sometimes wonder if there's a bit of sockpuppetry going on.

Hee. Oh my god, you have penetrated my obscenely clever ruse! Cris and Chris, how come nobody else saw it first? God, you're such a clever little Aussie.

But no. I'm the sarcastic and condescending asshole who likes bitching about queer issues and playing the angel's advocate, Chris s the poster with a short temper who posts these one-liners that generally consist out of fill in the blacks that resort to Godwin and/or rape. Yes?

Filling in blacks on what? What do you and the Tard know that they don't?

xerrofoot wrote:

Jay/Cris wrote:

Hee. Oh my god, you have penetrated my obscenely clever ruse! Cris and Chris, how come nobody else saw it first? God, you're such a clever little Aussie.

But no. I'm the sarcastic and condescending asshole who likes bitching about queer issues and playing the angel's advocate, Chris s the poster with a short temper who posts these one-liners that generally consist out of fill in the blacks that resort to Godwin and/or rape. Yes?

Filling in blacks on what? What do you and the Tard know that they don't?

Oh, damnit, I made a typo, so that your whackadoodle theory must be true. Obviously, one cause leads directly to your conclusion, and everything I said in-between is irrelevant.

Somewhere, a Debate Class would be lucky to have you.

theweirdkind wrote:

Hey, guys. I know I haven’t been around much, so I was not aware of the situation with the xerro pileup. Although many of us enjoy taking a cheap shot of each other once in a while, following a poster from thread to thread, and berating him about an irrelevant subject, is considered harassment. Since xerro has asked for you to stop and you have continued to do this, it is harassment. Just because multiple members are bashing the same person, this does not make it okay to harass. This is one of the few guidelines on the forum, so please respect it, and knock it off.

To address the rape threats, I have messaged xerrofoot about this and made it clear to stop or further action with will be taken up to banning.

So, this is the slipperiest slope ever. Does this mean we're all harassing Xerro by interacting with him? Because absolutely none of us agree with him, and it's rather easy to find examples of people insulting the dude across the threads. You know why? Because this is an insulting, hostile board and xerro is an idiot. (There, I did it again.)

Are there specific names that are in danger of being banned? Who has been harassing xerro and who hasn't? Can I now say nothing bad about My Little Pony anymore? Should I stop interacting with xerrofoot altogether? If I say HopClop, is it a red flag?

Also, xerro has made fun of my sexuality (which was hurtful!) in another thread and he is now calling me Chris (which is more hurtful!) None of those had to do with the topic at hand! Does this mean he is now harassing me too? If I throw enough childish tantrums and then tattle, will the board finally like me too? C'mon, mods, tell me!

Jay/Cris wrote:

Waaa

This site has a block function, use it if his posts wind you up so much. Simple as.

theweirdkind wrote:

following a poster from thread to thread

He's posted in a number of threads since this one and has not been followed.

Quote :

To address the rape threats, I have messaged xerrofoot about this and made it clear to stop or further action with will be taken up to banning.

Oh, how good of you to finally get off your ass and do something nearly a year later. Well done on doing it privately instead of public shaming/threats like you've done here. Only the best for people who make rape and death threats and throw around misogynistic and homophobic slurs.

Somath Cegem wrote:

Jay/Cris wrote:

Waaa

This site has a block function, use it if his posts wind you up so much. Simple as.

Shut the fuck up, McGee. Why aren't you telling your fellow pissed-pants brony this? I am so fucking sick of you making no contribution to a thread other than to descend from on high and lecture someone about not doing whatever, like you aren't a rat in a ditch like the rest of us.

Somath Cegem wrote:

Jay/Cris wrote:

Waaa

This site has a block function, use it if his posts wind you up so much. Simple as.

His posts don't wind me up, you buffoon. I couldn't care less about xerro: his idiocy is entertaining. What winds me up is that, thanks to his complaining, the mod-team has to take some sort of measure against harassing which ends up being no measure at all, because it's hideously vague.

Learn to read between the lines, you fucking idiot.

Cyberwulf wrote:

Somath Cegem wrote:

This site has a block function, use it if his posts wind you up so much. Simple as.

Shut the fuck up, McGee. Why aren't you telling your fellow pissed-pants brony this? I am so fucking sick of you making no contribution to a thread other than to descend from on high and lecture someone about not doing whatever, like you aren't a rat in a ditch like the rest of us.

I've had him blocked since about 2 weeks after he landed and started generally being terrible so I'm only preaching what I myself practice.
Also, since when was I a brony? Gods you would think I would know my own fandoms by now, but I guess not.

The thing is, if Cy complained to the admin/mods and they didn't do anything, that's one thing. AFAIK she didn't. He was reprimanded even without the complaint, again, AFAIK. [Though in thinking about it, I think I actually made a complaint on someone else's behalf on his behavior to Spotts, but that was a while ago, and I don't remember for certain.] Clopper made a complaint, which was a valid one, and under the flag of neutrality, a mod/admin had to take action of some sort. Weirdy is the most active mod right now, so it pretty much fell to her.

Personally, I think clopper is a waste of time, energy, space, and air, but the guidelines/rules are there for a reason. Get down on her if you want, but clopper's under a threat of banning, whereas Weirdy asked people to back off and follow the guidelines.

xerrofoot wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

What are you, fucking five years old? Irony is completely lost on you, isn't it?

Penguin wrote:

xerrofoot wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

What are you, fucking five years old? Irony is completely lost on you, isn't it?

It's why people keep picking on him, cause lets face it; Because I refuse to believe that he is a sock puppet; he either is A) completely ignorant of irony and sarcasm or B ) just doesn't QUITE grasp the concept of sarcasm or irony.

Would you please for the love of God stop answering rhetorical questions

Weirdy wrote:

Although many of us enjoy taking a cheap shot of each other once in a while, following a poster from thread to thread, and berating him about an irrelevant subject, is considered harassment.

We are not following him. Most of the time there is already a thread going, then he shows up, says something outrageously stupid, and then we insult him for it. We have occasionally used "irrelevant" crap to do so (like Cyberwulf bringing up Melissa's comment and smacking children from WAY back of GAFF up to Melissa's disappearance from THIS board, or ALL of the shit everyone gave Unskilled).

Take this thread, for instance. Clopper started a thread, probably with the hopes that someone would actually respond to it. Unfortunately, he said something incredibly stupid. Specifically, he said that he was better then soldiers because he doesn't drink except he totally does drink but only to manage physical pain, and that's the best option he has because some medication or other weakens his liver making him more susceptible to being drunk. And then we told him what a supremely stupid fuck up waste of carbon he is. Clearly this isn't "following" him or any of that stupid bullshit.

Frankly, it's impossible to NOT follow people on this forum, given the number of active threads at any given time. Are we supposed to ignore any thread Clopper posts in? Or are we supposed to post in them, but solely to blow sunshine up his ass so that he doesn't cry to mommy?

This isn't the petting zoo, it's the lion's den. Well, as much of a lion's den as any backwater forum about Star Trek Fanfiction can be. We always have and always will antagonize stupid people. It's kind of this forum's raison d'etre. It's none of our faults that Clopper is a fucking retard.

Furthermore, the guidelines have historically been unenforced. They were called guidelines for a fucking reason. They were meant to be suggestions how to not cause a total shit show, the only rules actually enforced were no illegal content and underage B&.

Of course you Great Crusadurrs for Justice and All That is Good aren't the Guru and can really do whatever you want. However, this forum isn't used to ego tripping admins micromanaging things.

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

Weirdy wrote:

Although many of us enjoy taking a cheap shot of each other once in a while, following a poster from thread to thread, and berating him about an irrelevant subject, is considered harassment.

We are not following him. Most of the time there is already a thread going, then he shows up, says something outrageously stupid, and then we insult him for it. We have occasionally used "irrelevant" crap to do so (like Cyberwulf bringing up Melissa's comment and smacking children from WAY back of GAFF up to Melissa's disappearance from THIS board, or ALL of the shit everyone gave Unskilled).

Take this thread, for instance. Clopper started a thread, probably with the hopes that someone would actually respond to it. Unfortunately, he said something incredibly stupid. Specifically, he said that he was better then soldiers because he doesn't drink except he totally does drink but only to manage physical pain, and that's the best option he has because some medication or other weakens his liver making him more susceptible to being drunk. And then we told him what a supremely stupid fuck up waste of carbon he is. Clearly this isn't "following" him or any of that stupid bullshit.

Frankly, it's impossible to NOT follow people on this forum, given the number of active threads at any given time. Are we supposed to ignore any thread Clopper posts in? Or are we supposed to post in them, but solely to blow sunshine up his ass so that he doesn't cry to mommy?

This isn't the petting zoo, it's the lion's den. Well, as much of a lion's den as any backwater forum about Star Trek Fanfiction can be. We always have and always will antagonize stupid people. It's kind of this forum's raison d'etre. It's none of our faults that Clopper is a fucking retard.

Furthermore, the guidelines have historically been unenforced. They were called guidelines for a fucking reason. They were meant to be suggestions how to not cause a total shit show, the only rules actually enforced were no illegal content and underage B&.

Of course you Great Crusadurrs for Justice and All That is Good aren't the Guru and can really do whatever you want. However, this forum isn't used to ego tripping admins micromanaging things.

This is why I believe you when you say you're an idiot.

I didn't say ANYTHING about being better than anyone. You took what I said COMPLETELY out of context; what I said was I'm not obsessed with getting drunk so how does that make me un-Australian and you have a drinking problem if you can't wait six hours for a beer. NEVER did I once say anything about being better than anyone else.

I should point out at this juncture that I have done the "Soviet anaesthetic" thing exactly ONCE. That does not make me a waste of carbon, oxygen or any other part of the periodic table. It means I sometimes do dumb things like any other person might do, including you.

I should also point out that you are totally missing Weirdy's point: the point is going "HURR DURR HOPCLOP" in every other thread I post in or create is defined as harrassment and therefore is not allowed here. You and your dumb little buddies refused to cut it out, so Weirdy had to step in. Considering how seldom staff has to step in around here, it's a sign that you really went over the line. If you can't understand that, there's no fucking helping you.

Stop calling me Clopper, stop going "HURR DURR HOPCLOP" everywhere and we won't have any problems. GOT IT?

Penguin wrote:

Would you please for the love of God stop answering rhetorical questions

Must... not... answer.