Abortion Doctor Charged with 8 Murders.

Cyberwulf wrote:

Who gives a shit if these women consented to sex or not?! Jesus Christ, people, stop playing into this misogynistic fuckface's hands. They wanted an abortion, were prevented from obtaining one legally, and felt as if they had no choice but to go to a back-alley butcher.

Let me say that again. THEY WERE PREVENTED FROM OBTAINING ONE LEGALLY - either through lack of money, or cultural reasons, or fear, or because the closest abortion clinic is two counties over, or because a mandatory waiting period means more time off work they can't afford, whatever.

This is the world that abortion clinic protesters want to build. This is the one that KelinciHutan and "her cause" wish to bring about. This state of affairs exists because Liberal Dudes insist that ladies shut up about their "special interests" in the name of "the big picture", and anyway here's the protocol that women who want an abortion should follow and men have a right to know about it and blah blah blah. It exists because old celibate men who live in Rome and turn a blind eye to the widespread rape of children think they can dictate to women what to do with their bodies.

Stop debating whether or not these women were raped with this disgusting, woman-hating piece of shit. Every time you do, you're implying that certain women deserve the luxury of an abortion, and other women should suck it up and pay the price for their whoring.

And if you can't stop, put the long streak of Alsation diarrhea on Ignore. It makes the forum a lot more bearable, believe me.

IAWTC.

And just look what the Pennsylvania Senate is doing now - proposing ANOTHER stumbling block to a woman's legal right to an abortion. I bet none of the Liberal Dudes who so like to skip back and forth, frisking their tails and whining "Rooooeee! Roooooeee!" to get women to shut up and vote Democrat at election time are going to do a fucking thing about it.

Cyberwulf wrote:

And just look what the Pennsylvania Senate is doing now - proposing ANOTHER stumbling block to a woman's legal right to an abortion. I bet none of the Liberal Dudes who so like to skip back and forth, frisking their tails and whining "Rooooeee! Roooooeee!" to get women to shut up and vote Democrat at election time are going to do a fucking thing about it.

According to the newspaper, the people suggesting the law are doing it hoping that this case has raised peoples awareness about how dangerous and ebul abortion is, so that they can push this curbing through to protect us all from this happening again.

Despite the fact that these cases are what happens when abortions are not readily available and this will just increase the amount of cases like this, but who needs facts and logic gaiz?

Cyberwulf wrote:

And just look what the Pennsylvania Senate is doing now - proposing ANOTHER stumbling block to a woman's legal right to an abortion. I bet none of the Liberal Dudes who so like to skip back and forth, frisking their tails and whining "Rooooeee! Roooooeee!" to get women to shut up and vote Democrat at election time are going to do a fucking thing about it.

What are they supposed to do, exactly? They don't control the governor's mansion or either chamber of the state legislature. So even if every single Democratic member of the legislature voted against it, it would still pass without 11 Republicans in the House or 6 Republicans in the Senate joining them. And the Governor is a pretty staunch conservative, so a veto is unlikely.

The minority in those chambers don't have the ability to procedurally roadblock this bill like they could in the U.S. Congress. Best chance would be to block it in Federal court, and I'd bet dollars to doughnuts Planned Parenthood is already prepping a challenge.

Everybody knows that educating kids about sex will only encourage them to have more sex at an earlier age.