Stockholm: An Exploration of True Love.

I found this "video game" under numerous sources, but the premise is that you are a kidnapper and through physical and sexual torture, you get your victim to fall in love with you. It is presented in video format with a real actress playing out all the scenes (the demo only shows options like "take off your coat" "gas her" "open the door"). You use your dvd remote to pick the choices and once you've beaten all free will out of her, you win! Yey!

This game has been banned from Amazon and other websites, however, there is a special offer!

Get this into your local college and get free stuff!

Also point (and some footage- could be triggering to some) of feminist view from riotgamer: here.

And counterpoint, from the director of the game, and those who think that the game should not be banned: here..

My favorite quote from the author of the game:" Women: How often do you see a guy that is just irritating, and you just want to have sex with him to put him in his place? He’s not super attractive or anything, he’s just annoying. And because he is annoying you just want to do sexual things to him. Not violent rape or anything, just sex.

It’s not an emotion that women feel that often, but men feel it all the time."

I can't wait to find all the super fun easter eggs in this game! Whoo, i wonder if there's a sidequest where I get to kill the kidnapper?

Yet more definition fail on Stockholm Syndrome.

Also goddamn, that guy could use a hit with a cluebat.

LeeLee wrote:

My favorite quote from the author of the game:" Women: How often do you see a guy that is just irritating, and you just want to have sex with him to put him in his place? He’s not super attractive or anything, he’s just annoying. And because he is annoying you just want to do sexual things to him. Not violent rape or anything, just sex.

Well I know I always feel a powerful burning urge to sexually humiliate men who annoy me, reminding them of their proper place as fucktoys. And that's totally not rape at all!

BOY I'M SURE CONVINCED THAT THIS "FEMINISM" STUFF DOESN'T MATTER AND IS JUST A LOAD OF BATSHIT BELIEFS OH YEAH. NO RAPE CULTURE HERE.

EDIT: Jesus Christ:

Quote :

The media has been blamed for trying to turn American men into docile, innocuous, weaklings. But in truth, American colleges are just as much to blame. That’s where men really learn to be servile weaklings, and learn that “true love” involves becoming a domesticated, self-abnegating, harmless, overly emotional pussy....It’s time to put the current, officially accepted version of romantic love on trial. Let’s see if it can stand up to the same rigorous analysis, the same comparison to opposing ideas, that every other idea receives in a university setting. It’s time to start a dialogue that fundamentally challenges that skewed version of love.

Remember fellas, if you aren't kidnapping, beating, and raping women into loving you, you're servile, weak, overly emotional and harmless. WHY, YOU MIGHT AS WELL BE A DISGUSTING VAGINA, LIKE ON A WOMAN. Who the game developers hate, obviously.

LOL

I originally read:

Quote :

Women: How often do you see a guy that is just irritating, and you just want to have sex with him to put him in his place? He’s not super attractive or anything, he’s just annoying. And because he is annoying you just want to do sexual things to him. Not violent rape or anything, just sex.

As:

Quote :

Women; How often do you see a guy that is just irritating, and you just want to have sex with him to put him in his place? He’s not super attractive or anything, he’s just annoying. And because he is annoying you just want to do sexual things to him. Not violent rape or anything, just sex.

And thought he was trying to say that fucking another man into submission was the ultimate man man's solution to women in general.



But woah what a fucked game. o_o

Geh, that fine line between things like bondage and complete and utter horror as above gets harder to discern with fuckwads like this.

Can we like, castrate him?

LeeLee wrote:

My favorite quote from the author of the game:" Women: How often do you see a guy that is just irritating, and you just want to have sex with him to put him in his place? He’s not super attractive or anything, he’s just annoying. And because he is annoying you just want to do sexual things to him. Not violent rape or anything, just sex.

It’s not an emotion that women feel that often, but men feel it all the time."

You know, I can honestly say that I have never felt like doing that.

This guy sounds like a creep, if he actually believes the situation in the game is a type of love.

I don't get the emphasis on dominating/submitting during sex. Viewed objectively, sex is ridiculous. You look like a complete tool when you're having sex no matter what end you're on. Quit projecting your issues into it and just have fun with it.

I am surprised that this game took so long to exist. All men think with their penises and video gamers can't even keep their attention on their prize long enough for the normal pre-fuck rituals. Of course, with this the womyn can't prevent him from deflowering her, and it even portrays it as a challange to conquer her until she wants nothing more than to please him.

Waffles wrote:

I am surprised that this game took so long to exist. All men think with their penises and video gamers can't even keep their attention on their prize long enough for the normal pre-fuck rituals. Of course, with this the womyn can't prevent him from deflowering her, and it even portrays it as a challange to conquer her until she wants nothing more than to please him.

Gee, Waffles, stereotype much?

Waffles wrote:

I am surprised that this game took so long to exist. All men think with their penises and video gamers can't even keep their attention on their prize long enough for the normal pre-fuck rituals. Of course, with this the womyn can't prevent him from deflowering her, and it even portrays it as a challange to conquer her until she wants nothing more than to please him.

Yes curse my lack of attention span, It gets so bad some days that

Somath Cegem wrote:

Yes curse my lack of attention span, It gets so bad some days that

Quoted.

I'm pretty torn on this one. On one hand, I don't like rape, but on the other hand, I really like free stuff.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Narwhal wrote:

I'm pretty torn on this one. On one hand, I don't like rape, but on the other hand, I really like free stuff.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I want to let you know I laughed so hard I fell over and that I want to increase my post count without actually contributing anything useful.

Kill yourself.

If I kill myself, will I get free stuff?

^
What awaits every person in heaven is eternal peace, and $10,000 cash.

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

^
What awaits every person in heaven is eternal peace, and $10,000 cash.

Whereas in hell, they get $10,000 cash and the soda machine only takes quarters.

Lysander wrote:

I don't get the emphasis on dominating/submitting during sex. Viewed objectively, sex is ridiculous. You look like a complete tool when you're having sex no matter what end you're on. Quit projecting your issues into it and just have fun with it.

But D/s IS fun, when you do it right. The trick is not to take it seriously either.

Narwhal wrote:

I'm pretty torn on this one. On one hand, I don't like rape, but on the other hand, I really like free stuff.

...I'm tempted to make an awful rape joke along the lines of "Sex? I can't give it away!" but I think I might actually have standards tonight. Also I'm too tired to think of how it'd work properly.

Supporting free speech is a pain in the ass sometimes. I believe this guy has the right to make this disgusting shit, and I believe that it's certainly better than the real thing if it provides an outlet for unhealthy fantasies, but I seriously, seriously just wanna haul off and slit the bottom of his sack open so his testicles unravel like little balls of yarn for adorable kittens to paw at. There's a limit, man, there's a fuckin' limit.

Who the hell did they get to act for this, anyway? I know people do horrible things for porn if there's decent money in it, but I find it hard to believe that they scrounged up enough cash to buy their way through THAT many scruples.

They sure are right about colleges, though. That's why date rape never happens there!

Hate hate hate hate hate hate HATE hate hate hate.


Thank you for watching Stockholm. And now, a word from our sponsor... [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]


(What? I said I had standards, but I didn't say I had HIGH standards.)


ETA: Realized I had a .gif of Room 302 and the PH emoticon pales in comparison

Harley should buy this game to help her do research for her fanfiction.

Lysander wrote:

I don't get the emphasis on dominating/submitting during sex. Viewed objectively, sex is ridiculous. You look like a complete tool when you're having sex no matter what end you're on. Quit projecting your issues into it and just have fun with it.

WE SHOULD ALL HAVE VANILLA SEX IT IS THE ONLY WAY SEX WAS INTENDED TO HAPPEN AND TOTALLY NOT BORING SO SUCK IT UP AND FUCK IT UP AND MOVE ON AND FOR GOD'S SAKE DON'T HAVE ANY EXTRA FUN

Verandering wrote:

Lysander wrote:

I don't get the emphasis on dominating/submitting during sex. Viewed objectively, sex is ridiculous. You look like a complete tool when you're having sex no matter what end you're on. Quit projecting your issues into it and just have fun with it.

WE SHOULD ALL HAVE VANILLA SEX IT IS THE ONLY WAY SEX WAS INTENDED TO HAPPEN AND TOTALLY NOT BORING SO SUCK IT UP AND FUCK IT UP AND MOVE ON AND FOR GOD'S SAKE DON'T HAVE ANY EXTRA FUN

Verandering, I rarely say this to you, but don't be a fucking moron. There's a massive, MASSIVE difference between consensual bondage/dom-sub where both parties agree to it and utilise safewords and discuss it beforehand, and domination where one person says "I'm taking what I want and fuck how you feel about it", which is the kind of "dominance" meant here.

Cyberwulf wrote:

There's a massive, MASSIVE difference between consensual bondage/dom-sub where both parties agree to it and utilise safewords and discuss it beforehand, and domination where one person says "I'm taking what I want and fuck how you feel about it", which is the kind of "dominance" meant here.

I agree with you there, ma'am.

Cyberwulf wrote:

Verandering wrote:

Lysander wrote:

I don't get the emphasis on dominating/submitting during sex. Viewed objectively, sex is ridiculous. You look like a complete tool when you're having sex no matter what end you're on. Quit projecting your issues into it and just have fun with it.

WE SHOULD ALL HAVE VANILLA SEX IT IS THE ONLY WAY SEX WAS INTENDED TO HAPPEN AND TOTALLY NOT BORING SO SUCK IT UP AND FUCK IT UP AND MOVE ON AND FOR GOD'S SAKE DON'T HAVE ANY EXTRA FUN

Verandering, I rarely say this to you, but don't be a fucking moron. There's a massive, MASSIVE difference between consensual bondage/dom-sub where both parties agree to it and utilise safewords and discuss it beforehand, and domination where one person says "I'm taking what I want and fuck how you feel about it", which is the kind of "dominance" meant here.

I know that and agree there, Cyberwulf. However, I felt the need to be pedantic, because I felt like being an ass. I mostly felt like being an ass because (and I may be getting Lysander confused with someone else) I seem to remember he said stupid bullshit regarding BDSM in the past in another thread. Either somewhere here on WGW or back on HoBF. I'm pretty sure it was Lysander, but memory isn't a sure thing.

Verandering wrote:

I mostly felt like being an ass because (and I may be getting Lysander confused with someone else) I seem to remember he said stupid bullshit regarding BDSM in the past in another thread. Either somewhere here on WGW or back on HoBF. I'm pretty sure it was Lysander, but memory isn't a sure thing.

:wtf2:

Not only do I not know (or care) what the fuck you're talking about, but I don't know what BDSM of any type has to do with what I said. Why don't you try taking what I say in context?

This guy isn't playing at bondage, and he's not trying to have fun. He's a serious asshole who thinks that he is the golden god of love and can tame all the women with the power of his dick. In reality, he's another guy who makes a funny face when he comes - just like everyone else - with a tremendous need to get the fuck over himself. Reminds me of all these other "AND I AM A MAAAAAHN!" types, like the Goreans. Buncha self-important assholes.

And even if I did inadvertently insult your sexual practices months ago for some reason, how the fuck does that justify jumping on what you think mine are now?

You didn't attach your comment to this asshole, you just left it as a sweeping generalization. And I seem to recall you doing this sort of thing before as well.