MorningSquirts.com

slimredninja wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Liefeld.

So apparently, according to the examples you gave, you've based this entire comic on stupid puns. It's like Drabbler but in the form of horrible art and way less funny. I also absolutely adore the way you're treating this like a serious project and not just a webcomic. You're referring to it using terms that make it sound as important and professional as the Manhattan Project. Jesus.

And don't kid yourself, your art is well below average. You say you've done illustrations for RPG books and that's exactly what it looks like - the kind of art in RPG books that I try desperately to ignore because it's so bad.

slimredninja wrote:

Heres a recent NSFW comic I wont post it direct since some sites are picky about that kind of thing.

[url==http://www.morningsquirtz.com/wild_ones.html][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

... You obviously didn't look around the boards too hard, did you? We've got a thread for MSPaint porn, for fuck's sake.

Quote :

Heres an album cover I just did recently.
[Image snipped

Airbrush vomited on this one too. Sharp lines are your friends, I'm serious. It helps it look less like a middle schooler's art project. I would never have paid for that picture.

Quote :

. To say we have an art/writing pedigree would be to beat a dead horse. I would like to see your stuff. Also I always think its cute to hear a critique from a novice.

The link to my DeviantArt-profile is in my sig, so click away. Also, some of us - like me - are in art school, and aren't exactly what you'd call "novices". Also, the excuse that our art looks worse than yours and therefore, our critique is not valid really doesn't fly, and in either case smacks of the same bratty mentality as "Don't like, don't read, meanies!".

frostflowers wrote:

Quote :

. To say we have an art/writing pedigree would be to beat a dead horse. I would like to see your stuff. Also I always think its cute to hear a critique from a novice.

The link to my DeviantArt-profile is in my sig, so click away. Also, some of us - like me - are in art school, and aren't exactly what you'd call "novices". Also, the excuse that our art looks worse than yours and therefore, our critique is not valid really doesn't fly, and in either case smacks of the same bratty mentality as "Don't like, don't read, meanies!".

At the risk of being cliche, you don't need to be able to cook to recognise bad food.

Dodgy, busy, blurry, hard to read. Your compositions are terrible. Stop being so goddamn redundant.

Quote :

Here are a couple of peices I did for Paladium's rifts I have done over a 1000 interior peices for a whole host RPG companies. Also we have 6 people that turn out comics so the styles are sometimes radically different. We have also worked on Thor/The Maxx/Wonderwoman/ The Flash/ Dr. Fate/ Impulse and Hawkman (literally dozens of others as well). To say we have an art/writing pedigree would be to beat a dead horse. I would like to see your stuff. Also I always think its cute to hear a critique from a novice.

Way to ego, dipshit. You post on the internet thinking that your experience is the best- that you are the only one worth mentioning. I would have never noticed the difference in styles, you all copy the same How To Draw Marvel books so that's moot. What matters is that none of you have the tact to back off and let a piece speak for itself as opposed to decorating the shit out of it and turning it into a clusterfuck competing for attention.

Again it's not what you know but who you know.

And if your work should speak for itself, why are you defending it?

And Doc, don't go there.

Dr. Professor Science wrote:

So apparently, according to the examples you gave, you've based this entire comic on stupid puns. It's like Drabbler but in the form of horrible art and way less funny. I also absolutely adore the way you're treating this like a serious project and not just a webcomic. You're referring to it using terms that make it sound as important and professional as the Manhattan Project. Jesus.

And don't kid yourself, your art is well below average. You say you've done illustrations for RPG books and that's exactly what it looks like - the kind of art in RPG books that I try desperately to ignore because it's so bad.

LOL its a project that was started by a bunch of industry vets at a con. I love the grandiose Manhattan Project statement but alas we are mere purveyors of dick & fart jokes. As for art critiques you do realize these are cartoons right? They are not supposed to be proportional anatomy exaggerations are part of cartooning.

slimredninja wrote:

LOL its a project that was started by a bunch of industry vets at a con. I love the grandiose Manhattan Project statement but alas we are mere purveyors of dick & fart jokes. As for art critiques you do realize these are cartoons right? They are not supposed to be proportional anatomy exaggerations are part of cartooning.

Still, compositionally your work is terrible. Anatomy exaggeration is all fine but cartoons don't look stiff- yours do.

Seconding Nihilist here - stiffness, bad composition and the fucking dodge and burn are your biggest issues.

Keep trying, and try to get better with each picture.

slimredninja wrote:

As for art critiques you do realize these are cartoons right? They are not supposed to be proportional anatomy exaggerations are part of cartooning.

IT'S MY STYLE. YOU CAN'T CRITICIZE IT BECAUSE IT'S ~*~STYLIZED~*~. :bang:

HE DIDN'T DRAW THESE CARTOONS FOR THE LIKES OF YOOOOOOU

slimredninja wrote:

As for art critiques you do realize these are cartoons right? They are not supposed to be proportional anatomy exaggerations are part of cartooning.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Ok tell me how these rate as cookie cutter? Everyone is done in a wildly different style. We try new mediums all the time.

Warning some NSFW images maybe included.

[url=http://www.morningsquirtz.com/420.html][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[url=http://www.morningsquirtz.com/69_pieces.html][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[url=http://www.morningsquirtz.com/Butter_Beans.html][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[url=http://www.morningsquirtz.com/Tinklebell.html][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[url=http://www.drunkduck.com/Morning_Squirtz/index.php?p=617240][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[url=http://www.drunkduck.com/Morning_Squirtz/index.php?p=159842][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Ever been to [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] ? I could have sworn those images would be perfectly at home with gems like this:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Did you make this too?

Yeah, wake-up call, your work is generic and not funny at all.

slimredninja wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Congratulations, you fail Photoshop forever.
You also fail anatomy and shading. (Also HAHAHAHA KILL WULFIE KILL)

And all your images have crappy resolutions.

Quote :

Ok tell me how these rate as cookie cutter? Everyone is done in a wildly different style.

And yet they are all hideous and shitty puns similar to those you'd find in one of those Reader's Digest cartoons they scribble in the margins of the pages.

Quote :

We try new mediums all the time.

You don't know what that word means do you.

Edit:

Quote :

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] REMOVED.com/420.html

How is this a joke.

Nihilist wrote:

Ever been to [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] ? I could have sworn those images would be perfectly at home with gems like this:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Did you make this too?

Yeah, wake-up call, your work is generic and not funny at all.

Sweet I didn't know I could post NSFW here are a couple of my takes on Spidey.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

BOOBS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY

ALSO WHY DOES MARY JANE HAVE DEFORMED HANDS

AND WHY ARE THEY HAVING SEX ON A RADIOACTIVE BED

THE COLORS THEY MAKE MY EYES BLEED

The way you draw boobs reminds me of

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I posted this in the wrong section...

It was supposed to go into FanArt but I clicked Antidotes instead.


In my defense it was damn near 2 am...

Mythandariel wrote:

I posted this in the wrong section...

It was supposed to go into FanArt but I clicked Antidotes instead.


In my defense it was damn near 2 am...

LOOK AT WHAT YOU HAVE WROUGHT.

Thanks for starting the thread Mythandariel its always greatly appreciated.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

No, slim, sweetie, no. What she means is that she meant to post this in our BAD fanart section, and she accidentally put it in Antidotes.

Hey hey mister

How do you become so "successful" while being such an awful artist/writer/person?

Tell me, so that I may learn. :teach:

Seule wrote:

Hey hey mister

How do you become so "successful" while being such an awful artist/writer/person?

Tell me, so that I may learn. :teach:

I contribute it all to my huge cock it has given me the confidence to always know I'm pretty awesome no matter what others may think of me.

pics or it didn't happen.

also COMMAS ARE YOUR FRIENDS, GODDAMMIT.

slimredninja wrote:

Seule wrote:

Hey hey mister

How do you become so "successful" while being such an awful artist/writer/person?

Tell me, so that I may learn. :teach:

I contribute it all to my huge cock it has given me the confidence to always know I'm pretty awesome no matter what others may think of me.

Then why are you defending yourself? Surely someone with such an infallible ego such as yours wouldn't even bother to come here.

Draw me Khan fucking Kirk in the ass and going "KHAAAAAAAN!" please. Show me how awesome you are, I remain convinced that the caked-on grease on my pot could draw better. It wouldn't be so bad if you didn't take yourself so seriously.