Like small-breasted women? That makes you a pedophile! :D

I can hear the chant of the Aussie paedophiles now:

"Get your tits off for the lads!"

I love how they classify ejaculation as a form of urination, even though the two are completely different substances.

Quote :

Female ejaculation has been banned on the incredible grounds that “the
depictions are a form of urination which is banned under the label of
‘golden showers’ in the Classification Guidelines” and/or “Female
ejaculation is an ‘abhorrent’ depiction.” Notably here male ejaculation is completely legal under the same guidelines, attracting an X rating in Australia.

STAND BACK WIMMINZ, EJACULATION IS A MAN'S WORK.

Am I the only one who saw this and thought, "That's not a breast, THIS is a breast!" or are my jokes just too outdated?

Also: Fail Australia, fail.

I am sorely tempted to print out that news article and show it to my coworkers because word-of-mouth just isn't going to work when relating this latest blunder.

I am now envisioning Australia training its police force to be certified Titty Inspectors:

"Raise your blouse and your hands, ma'am. See there, you have a B-cup, even though the right one is closer to an A-cup. Your boyfriend will have to come with us, ma'am."

"I'm sixty years old!"

"I enforce the law, ma'am, I don't question it."

Australia: Bizarro Japan

*examines self*

Well, guys, looks like I'm good to go in Australia. Time to start my porno career!

Knight wrote:

Am I the only one who saw this and thought, "That's not a breast, THIS is a breast!" or are my jokes just too outdated?

You very well may have been. But damn, that is funny.

Something that is interesting is that you can apply for a job on the
Classifications Board through the Attorney-General’s Department (so says the
FAQ on the OFLC website). However, the final decision on who gets the big position on the Board is still decided by the Federal Attorney-General regardless of what the selection committy says (an article from 2007).

I really wish the Board would pull it's collective heads out of arses and pay attention to what the Australian public is saying, but I'm not gonna hold my breath.

InkWeaver wrote:

*examines self*

Well, guys, looks like I'm good to go in Australia. Time to start my porno career!

By those standards, I could have started a porno career in Australia when I was 12. What do you mean I was underage? I had big titties! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Geez, as if large and small breasts aren't discriminated between badly enough as it is, now they even do it in censorship?

And may I ask, what size are they planning to classify as "small"?

Yes, have they said what constitutes 'small' yet? I'd like to know if my husband is a pedo. e_e

rae wrote:

Yes, have they said what constitutes 'small' yet? I'd like to know if my husband is a pedo. e_e

I was looking for this story through other sources and I found mention of A cups, but I don't know how official that is.

myeerah wrote:

rae wrote:

Yes, have they said what constitutes 'small' yet? I'd like to know if my husband is a pedo. e_e

I was looking for this story through other sources and I found mention of A cups, but I don't know how official that is.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Count me in as wondering where the cutoff is supposed to be and how they intend to define it for legal purposes? I don't find women with oversized pornstar breasts in the least attractive; at what point do I morph from normal to ephebophile to paedophile?

I'm reminded of that Law and Order: Special Victims Unit with the girl who was 17 but looked about 12, and had an older boyfriend who couldn't be prosecuted...

And this means that attractive women who would otherwise have a career in the porn insudtry (I can't imagine why they would WANT one but hey) will be encouraged to get implants.

So this means that I'm a lesbian pedophile?

But those big fake breasts are nasty.
I think if I was a lesbian, I would prefer smaller breasts. But then I was a B cup by the time I was 11. But the guys left me alone because I was fat and ugly.

Smaller breasts have all the nerve endings clustered together. It's more fun for the wimminz and for the mens who take advantage of the increased sensitivity.

Bigger breasts are eyecandy for the mens, but not so much fun for the wimminz who have to lug them about.

Why yes, I do enjoy pontificating on subjects I know nothing about [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Breasts are breasts are breasts. Some are big, some are small, and it really doesn't matter. As it is a breast and is attached to a woman, someone is going to like it. And they're unlikely to be a paedophile.

*scuttles off to think about bewbs*

ZoZo wrote:

Breasts are breasts are breasts. Some are big, some are small, and it really doesn't matter.

Quote :

it really doesn't matter.

Quote :

it really doesn't matter.

Them's fighting words. Put 'em up.

Breasts are not just breasts are breasts.

Large breasts are a bloody nuisance; that's what they are.

Harley Quinn hyenaholic wrote:

Large breasts are a bloody nuisance; that's what they are.

Nope, they're awesome, as are small boobies, and GENERALLY BOOBIES THAT ARE ATTACHED TO A LADY.

ZoZo wrote:

Harley Quinn hyenaholic wrote:

Large breasts are a bloody nuisance; that's what they are.

Nope, they're awesome, as are small boobies, and GENERALLY BOOBIES THAT ARE ATTACHED TO A LADY.

So you would discriminate against disembodied boobies? FO' SHAME! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Saleha wrote:

ZoZo wrote:

Harley Quinn hyenaholic wrote:

Large breasts are a bloody nuisance; that's what they are.

Nope, they're awesome, as are small boobies, and GENERALLY BOOBIES THAT ARE ATTACHED TO A LADY.

So you would discriminate against disembodied boobies? FO' SHAME! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Yes. I also discriminate against moobs with the above remark.

I'M NOT BEING BOOBIST BUT....