Like small-breasted women? That makes you a pedophile! :D

[url=http://www.inquisitr.com/59472/millions-of-extra-sites-to-be-censorsed-as-australian-gov-bans-small-breasts-female-ejaculation/]At least not according to this Australian law.[/url]

Quote :

The ban (RC) on small breasted women in adult publications has been made by the Australian Classification Board allegedly on the grounds that such images could be construed as child pornography, even where those publications comply with American law and keep certification that performers are over 18.

As a member of the Itty Bitty Titty Committee, I am dubious about this claim towards me being a child. Last I checked, I could still legally drink alcohol and vote, but who knows? Maybe I'm still attending grade school and waiting for my period to start. Somehow. Without my knowledge.

Quote :

Female ejaculation has been banned on the incredible grounds that “the depictions are a form of urination which is banned under the label of ‘golden showers’ in the Classification Guidelines” and/or “Female ejaculation is an ‘abhorrent’ depiction.” Notably here male ejaculation is completely legal under the same guidelines, attracting an X rating in Australia.

How completely unsurprising!

All in all, whatever, Australian government. You keep policing your internet, China-style, while the rest of the world (sans China) looks at you with wide-eyed amazement at your completely unironic Victorian attitudes towards porn. At least you're making America look better by comparison.

Oh, Australia! If you're not desperately trying to play keep-up with the real countries on censorship, you're leaping headfirst into stupidity even prudish countries like the US won't touch. Bless you!

lol, Australia

Hey, I do not look like a child. I actually find this very misogynistic and just offensive. They're saying only large-breasted women are truly women, and that's the only kind of woman you're allowed to be attracted to, or you could be a pedophile.

This is BS. Fuck you Australia.

I...uh...What? [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] Are some plastic surgeons paying off the government here? Because seriously, this is just mind boggling.

I agree with Lapin actually. Way to suck, Australia.

Edit: So what about early developers? Does that mean if they happen to develop early in life and have a large rack, they're not all that "paedo" then?

I'm glad I'm not Australian; don't want anybody getting between me and my delicious flat chest.

EDIT: vvv They've gone off their collective rocker, that's what the shit.

What the shit, Australia?

oh man i loved this news

Nothing's as awesome as being treated like and considered a child for something completely beyond your control. Let's extend that to sex as well.

Mafiosa wrote:

oh man i loved this news

Nothing's as awesome as being treated like and considered a child for something completely beyond your control. Let's extend that to sex as well.

Yeah well it's obv our fault for enticing the pedos into raping children so we deserve it rite

rite

Hmm...I guess that makes my father a pedophile for making three children with my small-breasted mother.

Verandering wrote:

Edit: So what about early developers? Does that mean if they happen to develop early in life and have a large rack, they're not all that "paedo" then?

Right? Considering the logic here, I've been steadily decreasing in age since I was 13. It's stupid to think that a person isn't pedofuel when they're actually underage just because they have big tits.

Verandering wrote:

I agree with Lapin actually. Way to suck, Australia.

Edit: So what about early developers? Does that mean if they happen to develop early in life and have a large rack, they're not all that "paedo" then?

Never thought of that. I was the only girl in fifth grade who was actually wearing a bra because there was something there to support, but I don't know that this would've necessarily made me less attractive to pedophiles. It did tend to attract creepy older boys who assumed that because I wore a 32C, I was all primed to have sex (I was 11 at the time).

I positively envied small-breasted women. Still do.

lol australia

What is the threshold between "child tits" and "woman tits"? Are the censors gonna bring in measuring tape and calculators to gauge how beeg are the american tee tees in the movies?

Exodia's Right Leg wrote:

What is the threshold between "child tits" and "woman tits"? Are the censors gonna bring in measuring tape and calculators to gauge how beeg are the american tee tees in the movies?

"Can you tell if she's 5'4 and a 34C or 5'7 and a 36D? You can't. Not from a photo."

So a mastectomy would be considered age-regression fetish, even if performed on old ladies?

LAWL!

Nihilist wrote:

So a mastectomy would be considered age-regression fetish, even if performed on old ladies?

Don't forget breast cancer patients! Who can range in age from early 20s to their 50s-60s.

The classification board is so far out of touch with reality and community standards its not funny.

Bamshalam, you may want to fix the link; it has one extra 'h' in there at the beginning.

And I nth the 'WTF, Australia?' sentiment. Do they have someone in the Department of Porn that is paid to go and closely examine every porn site specifically to mentally measure the breast size of the women in there?

Aggie wrote:

And I nth the 'WTF, Australia?' sentiment. Do they have someone in the Department of Porn that is paid to go and closely examine every porn site specifically to mentally measure the breast size of the women in there?

The classification board here is known for a lot of hypocrisy, confusion and all-out "wait, wut?". There's really no way to know which way they'll go on a item. It's definitely angered the video game community. They've even set up a political party to run against one of the key members of the board so that they can streamline the whole process and get some damn sense into the decisions.

Nihilist wrote:

So a mastectomy would be considered age-regression fetish, even if performed on old ladies?

Yes, as obviously a woman who underwent a mastectomy (or double mastectomy) will obviously immediately want to undergo yet another surgery on their chest to put in implants as soon as possible, so as not to be confused as children and get their far-too-old-to-handle-prison husbands or wives thrown in jail!

Australia is fast becoming the new Florida. Seriously?

Rabid Badger wrote:

Nihilist wrote:

So a mastectomy would be considered age-regression fetish, even if performed on old ladies?

Don't forget breast cancer patients! Who can range in age from early 20s to their 50s-60s.

Or older. My grandmother had a double mastectomy at 82. I guess by the standards of the classification board, that made her look like a child (never mind the gray hair and wrinkles).