Deeker's Diaper Page: Holy shit

Quote :

For Diaper Boys and Diaper Boys at Heart"
(and the girls who diaper them)
Proudly serving the Diaper Boys community since 1996
All ages welcome!

Okay.
Um. Oh god. I just.
Here we have a website that's been around for over a decade (and is still being updated as recently as Monday) dedicated to diaper fetishists. Which isn't unusual in itself, after all the nineties also saw the birth of Boston and Shaun and somethingawful so there was obviously weird shit aplenty in the early days of the internet.
Deeker's takes it's fetishism a whole step further, with not only a "webcomic" (I use that word in it's loosest sense) but a manifesto as to why men should be diapered, controlled and sexually frustrated by women.
And by women I mean sisters.
And Deeker wants to hear about your diaper experiences really badly; he puts a survey on every page asking you to please tell him about your own or a brother's diaper experiences with such probing questions as "Are you pantsless at home while in diapers?", "Which views of the diapered boys do you like the best?", and "If you are a girl or adult female, indicate what your relationship is to the diaper boy who viewed these drawings: ". Guh.

He also has this to say about the purpose of the website:

Quote :

To share my personal thoughts and feelings about diapers, and my experiences and observations upon which the foundation for these thoughts is based.
To provide for others who have similar thoughts and feelings about diapers a repository of materials to aid them in understanding, accepting, and exploring these thoughts and feelings
To provide for others who have similar thoughts and feelings about diapers a place where they can express and share their thoughts about and experiences with diapers.
To provide materials to aid people whose fantasies and desires for wearing diapers are unfulfilled or less than fully satisfactory the vicarious experiences of other peoples’ diaper situations.
To provide solace, comfort and assurance to those who may feel alone, uncertain, fearful, doubtful, guilty or insecure about their desires to wear diapers.
To encourage people to consider ideas not explored by other diaper lover web sites and to give thought and focused attention to these ideas.
To promote to parents the benefits of raising boys in a diaper-centric environment and foregoing toilet training boys.
To encourage girls to exhibit bodily cleanliness, maturity, modesty and responsibility in the presence of diaper-wearing boys who lack such virtues.
To educate girls on boys’ lesser abilities to maintain bodily cleanliness and proper elimination of bodily wastes and to exploit these weaknesses by keeping boys in diapers.

I'm not going to snark this. I can't. It's too squicky for me. From the porn traced in MSpaint with diapered lads added in to the creepy-not-assertive-but-weirdly-suggestive nature of Deeker himself it just gives me a highly uncomfortable vibe. I encourage you all to venture forth and see the strangeness for yourselves and bring back evidence of your travels.
This site is a goldmine, there's a ton of weirdness to be had. I'd post an art sample just for kicks but I'm not sure if the subjects are underaged or not.

I JUST DON'T KNOW ANYMORE.

Diaper-lad wrote:

To promote to parents the benefits of raising boys in a diaper-centric environment and foregoing toilet training boys.
To encourage girls to exhibit bodily cleanliness, maturity, modesty and responsibility in the presence of diaper-wearing boys who lack such virtues.
To educate girls on boys’ lesser abilities to maintain bodily cleanliness and proper elimination of bodily wastes and to exploit these weaknesses by keeping boys in diapers.

WHAT THE HELL?

I don't really have a problem with most kinks, but diaper-kinks/age-play/whatever it is creeps me out.
Also, how are we less able to properly eliminate waste? I can wipe my bottom either direction, whereas you ladies have to do it front to back.

I wonder if Senator David Vitter is a fan of this site?

Quote :

To encourage girls to exhibit bodily cleanliness, maturity, modesty and responsibility in the presence of diaper-wearing boys who lack such virtues.

I feel like I dodged a gender bullet, somehow.


Soooo much here. Let's take a look at his "Information for Girls".

Quote :

What I AM interested in are stories and other submissions from girls whose brothers and only whose brothers wear diapers, or from girls such as babysitters who know boys (past toddler-age) who wear diapers.

Well, I see the next GA News story in the works.

Quote :

If you are a young female visitor (under age 12) I would especially like to welcome you to this web site.

I...I bet you would...what's the FBI tipline number again?

Quote :

Much of the focus on Deeker's Diaper Page is to point out and emphasize the need for all boys to remain conspicuously and amply diapered at all times; in stark contrast to their similarly-aged female counterparts who blatantly flaunt the fact that they do not need or want to wear diapers and do so by wearing pants, shorts, skimpy panties or (black) thongs in the presence of smelly, immature, pantsless, bare-legged, thickly and conspicuously white-diapered boys.

I must say, it's nice when people underline all the psychological flags in their fetishes, so better for the profilers to connect the dots. (Dear Mr. Douglas: Please note that that gigabyte or so of bondage porn is stuff I want done to me, not stuff I want to do to others. Just makin' that clear BEFORE anyone around me drops dead under mysterious circumstances. Not that...y'know, I'm planning anything or...oh hell, this is turning into an Suspiciously Over-Specific Denial.)

Quote :

Please be aware that as this site obviously is about diapers and all the topics that come with the territory, there exists a great deal of vulgarity in reference to pee, poop, farts, butts, balls (testicles), penises and offensive bodily odors.

What offensive bodily odors aren't dealt with already in that sentence? Do they stuff durians in there too?

Quote :

You are also likely old enough to at least understand some of the basics of sexual development in boys. If you are not, please do not be afraid to ask your parents or a trusted adult, older sister, etc.

"Mom, what's basic sexual development in boys and why does it involve scantily clad women forcing them to wear diapers?"
"Honey, I thought you said you blocked those pages."

Quote :

* Survey for Girls Whose Brothers Wear Tighty Whities- Even if your brothers don’t always wear diapers (if at all), chances are they at least wear underwear. If they wear real boys’ underwear, the underwear that God intended for boys, then they wear tighty whities.

Unless you're reading the KHV (King Hanes Version), which reads, "And on the seventh day God got bored with resting and made Underoos, and it was good."

Quote :

The original title of this document was “The Girls Guide to Diapering Boys”. The title was changed because this article covers more than just diapering boys.

"Also, an increasing number of angry parents of preteens looking for babysitting tips were threatening to call the cops."

Quote :

Fun fact: the word “diaper” (including this one) appears 495 times in this article.

You know, mister, if you put some of the money you spend on diapers towards anti-anxiety medication, you might not have to count every instance a word appears in a document exactly four times before using the bathroom, and then you wouldn't need diapers.

And on, and on, and on. I'll be back to snark a bit more once the word "diaper" doesn't sound utterly nonsensical to my over-saturated brain.


That having been said, this guy's probably harmless. The fact that he's been online for over ten years without any backlash suggests he's probably vanilla enough, fetish aside. The trouble with any infantilism-based kink is that they tie in with childish things, and that's automatically suspicious. It utterly creeps me out--infantilism is my biggest squick--but I tend to feel bad for the guys that honestly don't cause any harm. They can't help how they're sexually wired more than anyone else can.

...but hey, I could be totally wrong and we DO have the pedophile emoticon, so we might as well use it. :pedo:

Ah, Deeker. Not one of my favorite age-play/AR sites. The tone turned me off, so to speak.

Delcat wrote:

That having been said, this guy's probably harmless. The fact that he's been online for over ten years without any backlash suggests he's probably vanilla enough, fetish aside.

Fanart and stories sections are especially nerve-wracking. The thumbnails on his own art section so download the .zip file...IF YOU DARE.

There is nothing remotely sexy about a grown ass man/woman shitting themselves (but Deeker's talking about teenage boys that crap their pants ). Seriously. The only way you think so is if you got kick in the head by a horse at some point in your life.

I disagree, Gyro's. I think that any kind of major traumatic head injury might do the trick.

Spotts1701 wrote:

I wonder if Senator David Vitter is a fan of this site?

Aw, dammit, you got there first.

It's probably in his bookmarks.

Someone's still bitter that Mommy stopped wiping his arse for him.

Quote :

Much of the focus on Deeker's Diaper Page is to point out and emphasize
the need for all boys to remain conspicuously and amply diapered at all
times; in stark contrast to their similarly-aged female counterparts
who blatantly flaunt the fact that they do not need or want to wear
diapers and do so by wearing pants, shorts, skimpy panties or (black)
thongs in the presence of smelly, immature, pantsless, bare-legged,
thickly and conspicuously white-diapered boys.

Gotta love it when people think their fetishes apply to everyone else ever.

AH! I actually stumbled across this crazy thing before (how, I can't quite remember). It's definitely...odd. I'd managed to push it out of my mind until now.

I don't really have any problems with infantilism or age-play, as long as it's kept to the adults. Adult baby dudes generally seem pretty...harmless, even if I wouldn't want anything to do with their kink and can't really understand it. But Deeker's apparent interest in underage boys being diapered, and having his readers fill out endless surveys regarding underwear and diapers, is a little creepy, to say the least.

Mafiosa wrote:

Delcat wrote:

That having been said, this guy's probably harmless. The fact that he's been online for over ten years without any backlash suggests he's probably vanilla enough, fetish aside.

Fanart and stories sections are especially nerve-wracking. The thumbnails on his own art section so download the .zip file...IF YOU DARE.

Yeah okay the deeper I delve here, the creepier it gets. Sorry, guys, I didn't realize how lightly I was scratching the surface. 136 sets of diaper boy drawings? I maintain that he probably hasn't done anything in real life because this would've been the first piece of evidence they used against him, but I'm quickly updating the reason why from "Not actually interested in young boys" to "Never had the chance because he exudes a choking cloud of Creepy Uncle from every pore".

That is one sick motherfucker, but it's a man. What can you expect? They're all perverts and pedophiles.

Waffles wrote:

That is one sick motherfucker, but it's a man. What can you expect? They're all perverts and pedophiles.

Actually, women can be perverts and pedophiles as well. They just go unnoticed because there are fewer of them, and unlike men, they don't insist on constantly talking about what they're doing or put up web pages devoted to their fetishes.

Rabid Badger wrote:

Waffles wrote:

That is one sick motherfucker, but it's a man. What can you expect? They're all perverts and pedophiles.

Actually, women can be perverts and pedophiles as well. They just go unnoticed because there are fewer of them, and unlike men, they don't insist on constantly talking about what they're doing or put up web pages devoted to their fetishes.

HOW DARE YOU, Quislinga!

Womyn are perfect, and any one who says otherwise is either a man or a deluded womyn.

Waffles wrote:

That is one sick motherfucker, but it's a man. What can you expect? They're all perverts and pedophiles.

Does 24 troll posts in one day qualify as spamming?

You know, when someone insists on running a site like that, you have to wonder how closely the FBI watches their traffic. At least, I hope they watch their traffic.

Penguin wrote:

You know, when someone insists on running a site like that, you have to wonder how closely the FBI watches their traffic. At least, I hope they watch their traffic.

Worst. Job. Ever.

ZoZo wrote:

Penguin wrote:

You know, when someone insists on running a site like that, you have to wonder how closely the FBI watches their traffic. At least, I hope they watch their traffic.

Worst. Job. Ever.

It seems like it at first, but just think: When you go for the arrest, you could beat and taze these people as much as you want and nobody would complain. Probably not even Cyberwulf.

It's like a nerd dream come true. You don't even need God to grant you the ability to punch over standard TCP/IP.

Verandering wrote:

Rabid Badger wrote:

Actually, women can be perverts and pedophiles as well. They just go unnoticed because there are fewer of them, and unlike men, they don't insist on constantly talking about what they're doing or put up web pages devoted to their fetishes.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Oh, come on. We're all like that here.

Penguin wrote:

... When you go for the arrest, you could beat and taze these people as much as you want and nobody would complain. Probably not even Cyberwulf.

I sure wouldn't.

To me, a diaper is possibly about the most unerotic thing there is. There are very few fetishes that I don't think I could embrace or at best tolerate in a partner. Adult Babyism/Diaper Lover stuff is one of them.

That being said, if someone wants to do AB/DL stuff alone or with their partner in the privacy of their home, fine. But I do find the fact that this dude is welcoming underage people onto his weird-ass diaper fetish website rather disturbing. And encouraging guys to not be clean? Just...

Sasuke's Wife wrote:

There is nothing remotely sexy about a grown ass man/woman shitting themselves (but Deeker's talking about teenage boys that crap their pants ). Seriously. The only way you think so is if you got kick in the head by a horse at some point in your life.

And so creepily specific, too. Older than toddler, but NO OLDER THAN 17 OR IT RUINS IT RAAAGH!!!

:pedo: :tmi: :throwup:

saeku wrote:

Waffles wrote:

That is one sick motherfucker, but it's a man. What can you expect? They're all perverts and pedophiles.

Does 24 troll posts in one day qualify as spamming?

It does to my mind. Ignore him, he's not even a very good troll.