Miley Cyrus' 9-year-old sister launches a line of kids' lingerie

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Do I even need to say anything? I feel skeezy just looking at the pictures in that article.

What.

I fear for the childrens. I really do.

Jesus Christ. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

EDIT because cool kids ect:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Keith Fraser wrote:

I feel skeezy just looking at the pictures in that article.

Seconded [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] I'm waiting for the news this is a hoax or that the line will be canceled or something...

For anyone curious, you may view the collection in question here. It's not so horrible as it could be (I don't see any black lace matching bra/panty sets, frex), but it's still enough to make me kind of... [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

REACTION FACE THREAD

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

KelinciHutan wrote:

For anyone curious, you may view the collection in question here. It's not so horrible as it could be (I don't see any black lace matching bra/panty sets, frex), but it's still enough to make me kind of... [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Yeah, it seems to be more minidresses than lingerie, kind of like Gothic Lolita with less black and more pink. And, y'know, worn by girls too young even to qualify as loli.

Keith Fraser wrote:

girls too young even to qualify as loli.

There's no such thing as TOO young for pedos...there's even porn with babys under a year old out there... sick bastards who drew it need to die.

Somath Cegem wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Spoiler:

Where did you get that fabulous image?! Also, stripper!Morrigan has no room to disapprove. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Good Lord, that child is ugly. Especially with all the make-up.

Aggie wrote:

Somath Cegem wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Spoiler:

Where did you get that fabulous image?! Also, stripper!Morrigan has no room to disapprove. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I googled sten disapproves and she popped up, so I threw her in instead.

>kids' lingerie

>kids

>lingerie

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Seule gets my vote for best avatar of the month.

Reidmar wrote:

There's no such thing as TOO young for pedos...there's even porn with babys under a year old out there... sick bastards who drew it need to die.

I agree. Not about murdering a human being for drawing a picture, but about infants being remotely sexy. I mean, they're just a slab of screaming, pooping flesh, with no personality or soul. Once they reach the age of four or five, it's understandable.

VileCorp wrote:

Once they reach the age of four or five, it's understandable.

The hell man? No, it's ALL messed up dude, meaning it shouldn't even be allowed period.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Who the fuck thought that that would be a good idea? Honestly?

Reidmar wrote:

VileCorp wrote:

Once they reach the age of four or five, it's understandable.

The hell man? No, it's ALL messed up dude, meaning it shouldn't even be allowed period.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I love watching newbies being newbies.

Reidmar wrote:

infinity--infinity-[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]-infinity-[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]-infinity+1

Could you knock the over usage of these emoticons off, please? In large doses their side effects may include dumbass-induced-rage, inclination of monkey-see-monkey-do and tendencies to threadshit.

See, you have me experiencing all three of these things just knock it off for chrissakes.