Massive Tunnle Vagina NWS

I have no idea why I was on Rule 34. I should have learned, but I some how stumbled upon this. I honestly have no idea what to say about this really. The mouse scares me so much.

The sad thing is, the quality of the artwork is pretty good, aside from the massive anatomy fail. There is something horribly wrong with that vagina, and I have to wonder if the artist has ever actually seen a real one.

That's fantastic in its own special way. Clearly it's drawn by someone who's never seen a vagina and is just sort of guessing at what it looks like.

What's the mouse doing there? That's what's really bothering me.

ZoZo wrote:

What's the mouse doing there? That's what's really bothering me.

That's the part that has me going 'wha?' as well.

I'm bothered by how short the taint is, personally. That's gonna lead to some infections.

Oh oh yikes. I did not notice that at first. Aaagh. It's less than a centimeter long!

I think the mouse (which I suspect is meant to be Stuart Little) is helping the man insert his penis. The guy must be completely inept at sex, especially considering with that vagina, he can't exactly miss.

The clitoris is kind of bugging me. It's more like a sore, given where they've put it. Also, his balls keep making me think of two clamshells snuggling together.

rae wrote:

The clitoris is kind of bugging me. It's more like a sore, given where they've put it. Also, his balls keep making me think of two clamshells snuggling together.

They really do. People need to study the anatomy of a vagina.

Maybe the clams are afraid of where they are about to enter (and as wide as that is, they WILL enter it). I would be. o.o

It looks like it's ready to swallow anything that comes it's way.

Someone has taken the whole business of referring to vaginas as 'caverns' waaaay too seriously.

And I agree about the clitoris-it took me a minute to figure out what it was supposed to be, because it's in the wrong spot. I figured it was some sort of vaginal wart from one of the many STDs this person likely has.

I can't believe I'm the only one who's noticed there's no urethra. It goes straight from the clit to her vag.

Delcat wrote:

I can't believe I'm the only one who's noticed there's no urethra. It goes straight from the clit to her vag.

No, it's not just you. I saw it, too.

DeeDee wrote:

Delcat wrote:

I can't believe I'm the only one who's noticed there's no urethra. It goes straight from the clit to her vag.

No, it's not just you. I saw it, too.

I have to say I was too busy puzzling over the mouse, then giggling at DeeDee's excellent explanation for it.

Shit, it's the mouse from the Rescuers.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

DON'T TELL ME THAT

OH GOD I WATCHED THOSE MOVIES WHEN I WAS A TODDLER.

Wow it's like throwing a hotdog down a tunnel.

ZoZo wrote:

What's the mouse doing there? That's what's really bothering me.

A_Note_Chaotic wrote:

Shit, it's the mouse from the Rescuers.

Maybe he's rescuing the woman from getting an STD.
NAH.

Ever noticed how the very worst pictures have good art, but terrible, horrible subjects? I mean, the horrible subjects is a given, but on the whole, the good art makes it even worse, in its own special way.

I've noticed that too, it's slightly depressing, because I want to appreciate the art, but the concept can make me wretch sometimes.

It's got to be Stuart Little. Lookit how helpful he is around the house!
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Wait... are they suggesting Hugh Laurie waxes? Where are the man's pubes and what is up with his balls?

Pixi wrote:

They really do. People need to study the anatomy of a vagina.

I'm going to need 500 volunteers aged 18-30 with no sense of shame.