Woman makes 13-year-old touch her boob, sentenced to life

Source

I still can't quite believe that this isn't a joke, but it's on quite a few news websites so I guess it's not...

WELL SHE'S A CHILD MOLESTER SO SHE DESERVES IT

AMIRITE

Bamshalam wrote:

WELL SHE'S A CHILD MOLESTER SO SHE DESERVES IT

AMIRITE

Her lawyer must have sucked ass but this will get appealed and she'll get a lighter sentence probably.
State statutes lol.

Quote :

Taylor, who lived in Jackpot, Nev., at the time of the crime, kissed a friend’s child, forced him to touch her breast and asked him to have sex with her in February 2008.

guh

Quote :

“She is getting a greater penalty for having a boy touch her breast than if she killed him,” she said.

Yeaaah. I'm all for being tough on pedos, but something here is out of whack.

Quote :

Taylor, who lived in Jackpot, Nev., at the time of the crime, kissed a friend’s child, forced him to touch her breast and asked him to have sex with her in February 2008.

Nice.

Seems a little . . . excessive. Life in prison for fooling around? If it was ongoing, systematic abuse, I could see that, but this seems to have been a one-time incident.
Our legal system. Gotta love it.

Meh, I'm of the mind that people who rape/mess with kids should be put away for a long, long time. So to me this is not really bad.

What she did was clearly wrong, but: how the hell many 13-year-old boys need forcing to touch a woman's breasts?

I wouldn't want to do something I'd normally like if I had someone trying to force me to do it at a point in time when I'd rather not be doing it. That goes triply more for sexual acts, since they're supposed to be, y'know, enjoyable.

szaleniec wrote:

What she did was clearly wrong, but: how the hell many 13-year-old boys need forcing to touch a woman's breasts?

why the fuck does someone say this every time there's a thread like this

BECAUSE ALL 13-YEAR-OLD BOYS WANT IS PUSSY AMIRITE


IMPOSSIBLE TO RAPE A TEENAGE BOY

Mafiosa wrote:

Quote :

Taylor, who lived in Jackpot, Nev., at the time of the crime, kissed a friend’s child, forced him to touch her breast and asked him to have sex with her in February 2008.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Dear Diary...

FYI, ironically Jackpot is a shithole.

Mafiosa wrote:

FYI, ironically Jackpot is a shithole.

Well, it's in the middle of BFE - I mean, it makes Elko look positively cosmopolitan.

Spotts1701 wrote:

Mafiosa wrote:

FYI, ironically Jackpot is a shithole.

Well, it's in the middle of BFE - I mean, it makes Elko look positively cosmopolitan.

I remember driving through it to get to Twin Falls and thinking, "People actually live here". The fact that it manages to makes this:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

look classy and desirable really says something.

Disclaimer: Life in prison for having a boy touch her seems a bit excessive, especially since most people (men) don't get near as much.

That said:


This is a case of an adult messing about with a kid. Imagine really hard if it was a man and the kid was a girl- the reaction you have now to that mental image should be applied to her. A 34 year old man forcing a 13yo girl to touch him inappropriately? And can't really remember because he was drunk? People here would be calling for tar and feathers.

Seule wrote:

BECAUSE ALL 13-YEAR-OLD BOYS WANT IS PUSSY AMIRITE

Some prefer the cock.

grmblfjx wrote:

This is a case of an adult messing about with a kid. Imagine really hard if it was a man and the kid was a girl- the reaction you have now to that mental image should be applied to her. A 34 year old man forcing a 13yo girl to touch him inappropriately? And can't really remember because he was drunk? People here would be calling for tar and feathers.

I know you're trying to open people's minds and get them to think about their own deep-seated emotional biases, and I applaud you for it. Really, GJ. But speaking from personal experience, this never works.

grmblfjx wrote:

Disclaimer: Life in prison for having a boy touch her seems a bit excessive, especially since most people (men) don't get near as much.

That said:


This is a case of an adult messing about with a kid. Imagine really hard if it was a man and the kid was a girl- the reaction you have now to that mental image should be applied to her. A 34 year old man forcing a 13yo girl to touch him inappropriately? And can't really remember because he was drunk? People here would be calling for tar and feathers.

You know, that's probably a very similar thought process to what the judge went through.

"Hrm, on one hand this isn't THAT super duper serious. On the other hand, if a man did this to a girl I'd probably sentence him to an eternity of Chinese Water Torture. Well, just to be all fair and equal and whatnot, I'll sentence this skank to life."

grmblfjx wrote:

This is a case of an adult messing about with a kid. Imagine really hard if it was a man and the kid was a girl- the reaction you have now to that mental image should be applied to her. A 34 year old man forcing a 13yo girl to touch him inappropriately? And can't really remember because he was drunk? People here would be calling for tar and feathers.

Logical thought!? In a thread about kids and sexual stuff? My god!

Have I told you lately that I love you grumabix?

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

You know, that's probably a very similar thought process to what the judge went through.

"Hrm, on one hand this isn't THAT super duper serious. On the other hand, if a man did this to a girl I'd probably sentence him to an eternity of Chinese Water Torture. Well, just to be all fair and equal and whatnot, I'll sentence this skank to life."

According to the article the charge carries a mandatory life sentence and the judge's decision was to give her ten years until parole (he also mentioned that while he was bound to hand it down, he wasn't sure why the prosecution had chosen that particular charge). For some reason the jury wasn't allowed to know the 'potential sentence' in this case. Is it common to withhold that information?

This whole thing is very strange. Apart from the way she would have gotten less time for killing him, where are all the reports of male abusers (those being the most common) getting life for messing around with minors? Does it not make the news, or do they evade the 'lewdness with a minor' charge and wind up with a lesser sentence?

grmblfjx wrote:

Disclaimer: Life in prison for having a boy touch her seems a bit excessive, especially since most people (men) don't get near as much.

That said:


This is a case of an adult messing about with a kid. Imagine really hard if it was a man and the kid was a girl- the reaction you have now to that mental image should be applied to her. A 34 year old man forcing a 13yo girl to touch him inappropriately? And can't really remember because he was drunk? People here would be calling for tar and feathers.

EXCEPT the lady got the boy to touch her boob. Only her boob. If a man got a 13yo girl to touch his chest? Yeah, I'm not seeing much tar there, and certainly not life.

Sutremaine wrote:

According to the article the charge carries a mandatory life sentence and the judge's decision was to give her ten years until parole (he also mentioned that while he was bound to hand it down, he wasn't sure why the prosecution had chosen that particular charge). For some reason the jury wasn't allowed to know the 'potential sentence' in this case. Is it common to withhold that information?

For anything less than a capital crime? Yes.

Juries only decide guilt or innocence - the judge is the one that imposes sentence.

The only exception is cases where the prosecution seeks the death penalty. In those cases (at least here in Nevada), the jury is given three sentencing options to choose from: death, life without the possibility of parole, and life with the possibility of parole after a certain number of years (20 seems to be the norm).

Somath Cegem wrote:

Have I told you lately that I love you grumabix?

Actually, the last thing I heard from you was you wanting to slap a certain group of people that happens to include me.

Seule wrote:

EXCEPT the lady got the boy to touch her boob. Only her boob. If a man got a 13yo girl to touch his chest? Yeah, I'm not seeing much tar there, and certainly not life.

Yeah, but we're talking about a country where a topless woman at the beach can get in trouble for public nudity and a man without a shirt won't. Boobs are, on average, much more sensitive and much more seen as a sexual thing than a man's chest.

Seule wrote:

EXCEPT the lady got the boy to touch her boob. Only her boob.

And then she solicited a minor for sex. People have been Chris Hansened for as much.