| Keeping it in the family | |
|
+22Seule Miss Misery Sutremaine Cyberwulf Nightboomfer ZoZo bleachedblackcat zootie Mikey Go WOOGA gaijinguy Lady Anne Spotts1701 Verandering TheHermit grmblfjx Salamas EileenK98 Mafiosa Miss Prince Jesus. KelinciHutan Tungsten Monk 26 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Tungsten Monk Sporkbender
Join date : 2009-06-11 Age : 36 Location : Cedar Rapids, IA
| Subject: Keeping it in the family Fri Apr 30, 2010 2:01 pm | |
| "I'm in love with my grandson, and we're having a baby!" I . . . I don't know what to think, honestly. So I did the responsible thing and decided to post it on a forum full of snarkers. - Quote :
- Pearl Carter is positively glowing with joy. She has a handsome new boyfriend, is enjoying an active sex life after many years of celibacy and, amazingly, is preparing to become a mother again.
But the retired grandmother isn't carrying the baby herself. She and her young lover have spent a staggering $54,000 hiring a surrogate to help them with their dreams of having a child.
What makes Pearl's decision to become a mum again even more shocking is that her new boyfriend is her biological grandson, 26-year-old Phil Bailey. Which means that her new baby is going to be both her daughter and her great-grandchild. This is the kind of thing that makes me think of the Hapsburgs (and we all know how well those guys turned out). Pearl got pregnant at eighteen, but her parents made her give the baby up for adoption. She was never able to find her daughter Lynette, but after Lynette died from cancer, Pearl's grandson Phil began looking for his biological family. - Quote :
- When Phil phoned Pearl, the pair admits they were both rather nervous. Pearl told Phil about being forced to give up Lynette for adoption, and Phil told Pearl about his mum dying of cancer.
'We both cried but kept talking for three hours,' she says. 'When he emailed me a photo, I thought what a handsome and sexy man he was before pinching myself – he was my grandson!'
Confused, Pearl talked to a friend, who told her about an article she'd read on Genetic Sexual Attraction (GSA), which occurs when close relatives meet as adults and are attracted to each other.
'I could now understand my feelings and realise they weren't wrong,' Pearl says.
In 2006, Phil met his grandmother for the first time.
'From the first moment that I saw him, I knew we would never have a grandmother-grandson relationship,' Pearl remembers happily. 'For the first time in years I felt sexually alive.' I'm not entirely sure what creeps me out about this, to be honest. They seem like a fairly well-adjusted pair, and thought it through before deciding to have a baby. But close relatives having a baby is a dicey proposition--one of the reasons incest is taboo in nearly every culture. What do you think, guys? | |
|
| |
KelinciHutan Global Nomad
Join date : 2009-06-03 Age : 40 Location : USS Enterprise
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Fri Apr 30, 2010 2:17 pm | |
| Oh. Oh dear. That's so very wrong.
Also, that girl will be her own grandmother. | |
|
| |
Jesus. Shitgobbling pissdrinker
Join date : 2009-11-16 Age : 34 Location : Somewhere in the past, I blinked.
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Fri Apr 30, 2010 2:40 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Miss Prince Shitgobbling pissdrinker
Join date : 2009-06-10 Age : 36
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Fri Apr 30, 2010 2:53 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Mafiosa You crack me up, little buddy!
Join date : 2009-06-03
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Fri Apr 30, 2010 3:19 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
EileenK98 Recovering Fanbrat
Join date : 2009-06-10 Age : 56 Location : very, very close to Chris
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Fri Apr 30, 2010 4:19 pm | |
| - Jesus. wrote:
- Futurama, anyone?
I see no time travel involved here. The only circumstance under which this would be acceptable. (Sort of.) This . . . this is just wrong, on so many levels. They know they're related, and still have a relationship anyway? How are they going to explain this to the kid, when the time comes? | |
|
| |
Salamas Sporkbender
Join date : 2009-06-11 Age : 34 Location : Dark Corner
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Fri Apr 30, 2010 5:48 pm | |
| I read this last night and my reaction went from [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] to [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] to [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] - Quote :
Confused, Pearl talked to a friend, who told her about an article she'd read on Genetic Sexual Attraction (GSA), which occurs when close relatives meet as adults and are attracted to each other.
'I could now understand my feelings and realise they weren't wrong,' Pearl says. Okay...Oookay...Just because it has the word "genetic" in it, does not make it okay, this is still incest and just wrong. That child is going to be so confused. | |
|
| |
grmblfjx Hot and Botherer
Join date : 2009-06-10
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Fri Apr 30, 2010 7:50 pm | |
| [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]So they put "pregnant" in quotation marks because it's surrogate? Because I was a bit puzzled about that earlier. | |
|
| |
TheHermit Shitgobbling pissdrinker
Join date : 2009-06-12
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:19 pm | |
| Intellectually speaking, I get this. A lot of the mental associations which paint family members (and close childhood friends) as "off-limits" for sexual attraction take place early in life. If you avoid contact during those years, those blockers never get put in place and then it's off to the races. Sort of a bug in the ol' mental software. So, yes, I completely understand how this can happen. But on a gut emotional level? [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] | |
|
| |
Verandering The Gender Offender
Join date : 2009-06-04 Location : Colorado
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:50 pm | |
| - Salamas wrote:
- That child is going to be so confused.
How many times has that been said about anything people were scared of and unfamiliar with? Children are only going to be confused when society refuses to treat them the same way as others through absolutely no fault of their own. This happens with everything that's not society-sanctified ideal, and even some things that are regardless of the individual. | |
|
| |
Spotts1701 Chief Cook and Bottle Washer
Join date : 2009-06-10 Age : 45 Location : New Vertiform City
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:02 pm | |
| - Verandering wrote:
- Salamas wrote:
- That child is going to be so confused.
How many times has that been said about anything people were scared of and unfamiliar with?
With respect, this is a little more out there than most "unfamiliar" situations. | |
|
| |
Mafiosa You crack me up, little buddy!
Join date : 2009-06-03
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:30 pm | |
| - Spotts1701 wrote:
- Verandering wrote:
- Salamas wrote:
- That child is going to be so confused.
How many times has that been said about anything people were scared of and unfamiliar with?
With respect, this is a little more out there than most "unfamiliar" situations. Yeah, I'm not sure this is a argument you want to apply to incest. There's a very good reason it's frowned upon. Also that kid's gonna be confused anyway and asking questions about his extra toes. | |
|
| |
Lady Anne NO NOT THE BEEEEES
Join date : 2009-06-12 Age : 48 Location : The land of the fruits and nuts
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:43 pm | |
| As least it's not quite as closely related as a parent/child pairing. | |
|
| |
gaijinguy Shitgobbling pissdrinker
Join date : 2009-06-10 Location : Assuming a spherical frictionless cow
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:42 pm | |
| - Lady Anne wrote:
- As least it's not quite as closely related as a parent/child pairing.
Um. . . yay? | |
|
| |
Mikey Go WOOGA NO NOT THE BEEEEES
Join date : 2009-06-16 Age : 35 Location : In desperate pursuit of lulz.
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:58 pm | |
| "I was driving through this town in the middle of fucking nowhere Alabama, and I came across some fool with a bumper sticker that read, 'Proud father of a nephew.'" | |
|
| |
zootie Sporkbender
Join date : 2009-11-28
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:16 pm | |
| - Tungsten Monk wrote:
What makes Pearl's decision to become a mum again even more shocking is that her new boyfriend is her biological grandson, 26-year-old Phil Bailey.
I'm not entirely sure what creeps me out about this, to be honest. They seem like a fairly well-adjusted pair, and thought it through before deciding to have a baby. But close relatives having a baby is a dicey proposition--one of the reasons incest is taboo in nearly every culture.
What do you think, guys? Heh heh heh! The Femin Coven is closer than you think. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] | |
|
| |
bleachedblackcat Armbiter of Good Fanfiction
Join date : 2009-06-11
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Sat May 01, 2010 12:10 am | |
| Am I the only one who looked at the titles of the articles and went "Oh, that's what happened to the people who wrote titles for Jerry Springer."? | |
|
| |
Salamas Sporkbender
Join date : 2009-06-11 Age : 34 Location : Dark Corner
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Sat May 01, 2010 3:21 am | |
| - Mafiosa wrote:
- Spotts1701 wrote:
- Verandering wrote:
- Salamas wrote:
- That child is going to be so confused.
How many times has that been said about anything people were scared of and unfamiliar with?
With respect, this is a little more out there than most "unfamiliar" situations. Yeah, I'm not sure this is a argument you want to apply to incest. There's a very good reason it's frowned upon.
Also that kid's gonna be confused anyway and asking questions about his extra toes. What they said. Also Mafi, since the 'mother' has hit menopause the egg is from the surrogate mother, but still *shudders* | |
|
| |
ZoZo Knight of the Bleach
Join date : 2009-06-10 Age : 39 Location : In WD40's head
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Sat May 01, 2010 5:21 am | |
| I knew GSA would be mentioned somewhere. Funnily enough, I can't find any actual scientific evidence on it... | |
|
| |
Nightboomfer
Join date : 2010-04-20
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Sat May 01, 2010 8:51 am | |
| What the fuck dude...
Also, is it just me or are those two the buttfuck ugliest people I've ever seen together?
Maybe that's why the relationship works... | |
|
| |
Verandering The Gender Offender
Join date : 2009-06-04 Location : Colorado
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Sat May 01, 2010 3:14 pm | |
| - Salamas wrote:
- Mafiosa wrote:
- Spotts1701 wrote:
- Verandering wrote:
- Salamas wrote:
- That child is going to be so confused.
How many times has that been said about anything people were scared of and unfamiliar with?
With respect, this is a little more out there than most "unfamiliar" situations. Yeah, I'm not sure this is a argument you want to apply to incest. There's a very good reason it's frowned upon.
Also that kid's gonna be confused anyway and asking questions about his extra toes. What they said. Bullshit. This is not a little more out there than more "unfamiliar" situations. Back in a time when females wearing pants was seen as sketchy gender transgression, can you imagine how issues like non-binary gender identity transition would have been received? So no. You're all being reactionary in the exact same way. It's a radically different boundary (ie. nonexistent) to what you've come to understand as "normal," and that's been applied and will be applied to everything under the sun. The only "very good reason" I can think of is something genetic, because incest does bad things for the chances of hereditary diseases. What else ya got, folks? Edit: In before someone tells me I'm condoning incest and immorality. | |
|
| |
Cyberwulf NO NOT THE BEEEEES
Join date : 2009-06-03 Age : 43 Location : TRILOBITE!
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Sat May 01, 2010 4:17 pm | |
| - Mafiosa wrote:
Also that kid's gonna be confused anyway and asking questions about his extra toes. Grandma's seventy-two, dipshit. | |
|
| |
Mafiosa You crack me up, little buddy!
Join date : 2009-06-03
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Sat May 01, 2010 4:24 pm | |
| - Cyberwulf wrote:
- Mafiosa wrote:
Also that kid's gonna be confused anyway and asking questions about his extra toes. Grandma's seventy-two, dipshit. No one ever lets me have my dumb jokes. | |
|
| |
Sutremaine Shitgobbling pissdrinker
Join date : 2009-11-14 Age : 39 Location : UK
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Sat May 01, 2010 5:15 pm | |
| - Verandering wrote:
- The only "very good reason" I can think of is something genetic, because incest does bad things for the chances of hereditary diseases.
Although in this case it doesn't apply anyway since the egg won't be coming from her. Personally I'm against incest being normalised in any way because it'll just lead to infinitely more cases of intra-family abuse. Maybe in a world where family abuse is taken as seriously as stranger-jumping-out-of-a-bush abuse, but that won't be happening any time soon. There are just far too many power issues involved with incest as a whole for me to be comfortable with it. | |
|
| |
Miss Misery Sporkbender
Join date : 2009-06-10 Location : My home planet
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family Sun May 02, 2010 9:32 am | |
| That's good old-fashioned nightmare fuel right there. Gross! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Keeping it in the family | |
| |
|
| |
| Keeping it in the family | |
|