Keeping it in the family

Personally... I don't see anything wrong with this. As the egg isn't coming from the woman anyway, there'll be no physical negative effects on the child, and they're happy! The child could do much worse than be brought up in this family.

Seule wrote:

Personally... I don't see anything wrong with this. As the egg isn't coming from the woman anyway, there'll be no physical negative effects on the child, and they're happy! The child could do much worse than be brought up in this family.

I agree.

Everyone is going 'augh gross' and [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
but isn't that the exact same reaction gay couples get from people and those people get looked down on for being narrow minded?
It just seems hypocritical to me.
I can see being concerned for the child's safety, but that is not even an issue in this case.

jnickd wrote:

Seule wrote:

Personally... I don't see anything wrong with this. As the egg isn't coming from the woman anyway, there'll be no physical negative effects on the child, and they're happy! The child could do much worse than be brought up in this family.

I agree.

Everyone is going 'augh gross' and [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
but isn't that the exact same reaction gay couples get from people and those people get looked down on for being narrow minded?

Do you really want me to explain the wide, gaping chasm in your logic, or can you figure it out on your own?

Spotts1701 wrote:

jnickd wrote:

Seule wrote:

Personally... I don't see anything wrong with this. As the egg isn't coming from the woman anyway, there'll be no physical negative effects on the child, and they're happy! The child could do much worse than be brought up in this family.

I agree.

Everyone is going 'augh gross' and [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
but isn't that the exact same reaction gay couples get from people and those people get looked down on for being narrow minded?

Do you really want me to explain the wide, gaping chasm in your logic, or can you figure it out on your own?

As bad and downright weird as this story as, it was mash-name there who actually weirded me out. Are you seriously comparing incest to homosexuality? What kind of screwed up logic are you running on?

I did not say homosexuality and incest were the same. I said people's reactions to them are the same.

jnickd wrote:

I did not say homosexuality and incest were the same. I said people's reactions to them are the same.

Wow, people have differing opinions about different things. Imagine that.

I can say that X is acceptable, and say Y is not acceptable because X and Y are different things.

Ignoring the wank, and because I didn't see this story before, so long as she didn't raise you and you didn't know her at all during your early childhood (which is the only reason you'd end up with any sort of trauma from this or respect her as an authority figure and be manipulated into it), I have no problem with incest (as long as they have no kids, which they are not).

Article's no longer up. It seems like it's a hoax, too.