Joe Francis

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

And the previous century had this faggot.

*whaps Mikey upside the head*

That "faggot" was President of the United States. If you do not have the common decency to respect him, then have the decency to respect the office he held.

Wanker.

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

And the previous century had this faggot.

I think [url=http://www.whygodwhy.org/]this idiocy-spouting pillock with the IQ and EQ of a tomato[/url] was born in the 20th century as well. Although sometimes I wonder if, perhaps, we're better off ignoring him altogether.

Jay/Cris wrote:

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

And the previous century had this faggot.

I think this idiocy-spouting pillock with the IQ and EQ of a tomato was born in the 20th century as well. Although sometimes I wonder if, perhaps, we're better off ignoring him altogether.

Here I was thinking that was a link to Dubya.

I didn't really DO anything douchey in the 20th century though. And my douchery in the 21st century is very limited is scope. It's really just you guys who know of it.

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

And the previous century had this faggot.

Oh Mikey, you're so far behind on your right-winger rhetoric. The Republican party has forgotten about Clinton for the most part since everything bad that happened during his administration was all Reagan's fault, so they try to pin it on Carter, and usually slip something in about Obama being Carter Mark II. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Penguin wrote:

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

And the previous century had this faggot.

Oh Mikey, you're so far behind on your right-winger rhetoric. The Republican party has forgotten about Clinton for the most part since everything bad that happened during his administration was all Reagan's fault, so they try to pin it on Carter, and usually slip something in about Obama being Carter Mark II. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Haven't they gone back even further and found a way to blame it on Kennedy & Johnson (and maybe FDR & Trumann, too) yet?

If Lincoln had just let the South secede this would have never happened.

You know Mikey, just a minor correction. If he slept with women, that means he's not a faggot, which implies he slept with men. Keep your insults tailored towards the person you're insulting.

Lapin wrote:

You know Mikey, just a minor correction. If he slept with women, that means he's not a faggot, which implies he slept with men. Keep your insults tailored towards the person you're insulting.

Mikey fails at everything, so why would you think he wouldn't fail with his insults?

Malganis wrote:

Lapin wrote:

You know Mikey, just a minor correction. If he slept with women, that means he's not a faggot, which implies he slept with men. Keep your insults tailored towards the person you're insulting.

Mikey fails at everything, so why would you think he wouldn't fail with his insults?

I think he's still using it in the sense of that short period during the late 90s that teenagers took to using it and claiming it meant the same thing as douche and they weren't really calling the person a fag at all, and, like, gay people were just getting upset over nothing!

I didn't buy it then, and I don't buy it now. Men who call other men fags always reminds me of what my mom said about people who had something to hide shouting the loudest. That's how we know the Pastor of the Westboro Baptist Church is so far in the closet he needs a GPS to find his way back out.

Mikey Go WOOGA wrote:

You never had sexual attractiveness, fatty.

And heaven forbid a man have preferences to what he likes in a woman.

And heaven forbid he find a less douchey way of expressing those preferences.

I really hate it when I have to feel embarrassed for someone irritating.

Since I've come back to the board, I've noticed you've been trying to fashion yourself into...well, that guy, Mikey.

You're not that guy. You will never be that guy. Stop embarrassing yourself.

And, uh, Mike? Did you forget that you posted your picture? Keep throwing stones in that shiny, glass house of yours, babe.

So does anyone give a damn about Guys Gone Wild, which takes advantage of drunk men, or is it ok to do that?

V3N0M wrote:

So does anyone give a damn about Guys Gone Wild, which takes advantage of drunk men, or is it ok to do that?

GUESS

I give a damn that the guys in it don't go as far as their female counterparts, so it's not as entertaining to watch (though other companies HAVE produced versions where that does happen).

V3N0M wrote:

So does anyone give a damn about Guys Gone Wild, which takes advantage of drunk men, or is it ok to do that?

Hey Unskilled, welcome back.

V3N0M wrote:

So does anyone give a damn about Guys Gone Wild, which takes advantage of drunk men, or is it ok to do that?

You shouldn't be watching stuff like that anyway, kid.

Guys Gone Wild is just as fucked up. It's not right to get someone piss drunk and then get them to act stupid on camera and sell it. It's just low. Hire some gawddamn porn actors, and stage it like it's "reality", like the Blair Witch Product.

Oh wait, that would require him to not exploit people for free.

Lapinina wrote:

Guys
Gone Wild is just as fucked up. It's not right to get someone piss
drunk and then get them to act stupid on camera and sell it.

Yes, put it on YouTube where everyone can see it for free.

V3N0M wrote:

So does anyone give a damn about Guys Gone Wild, which takes advantage of drunk men, or is it ok to do that?

Must...not...make joke...about Joe Francis' stint...in prison.

It's Unskilled, or someone just like him. Why do you people not have him on your blocklist?

Because blocklists are for pussies. :eng101:

No, they are not. All the cool kids are doing it.

If all the cool kids jumped off of a bridge, would you?

Alternate Response: Well I'm not cool.

I'm hot. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]