How many roads must a man walk down, before he can call himself a pedo? NWS

A Man's Journey

Okay, due to the One Rule, I can't spork much of this. You can thank Nihilist/The Site Guru for that.

...Then again, I don't know how much you'd really want to read of this particular work of 'erotica'.

Quote :

A Man's Journey (MFg,extreme pedo,nepi,toddler,inc)

Take those warnings seriously, folks, because he means to use each and every one of them.

Quote :

My name is John, I'm 35, 6ft, 175 lbs.

What's your favorite color? What's your favorite flower? What did you eat for breakfast today? What was the size, shape, color, and composition of your last bowel movement?

Quote :

This is my story.

That makes this piece of shit sound a lot more dramatic than it warrants.

Quote :

I was brought up in a very loving family. I was introduced to incest at the
age of 3, by my mother.

I'm pretty sure that precludes being raised in a loving family.

Quote :

She is 5'7, jet black hair, 150 lbs, curves in all the
right places,

Oh, come on. Everyone in Badficland has those.

Quote :

40DD boobs, and a trimmed pussy that smelled like heaven.

I've never smelled heaven, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't smell like crotch.

Quote :

My experiences with my mom, never left my thoughts. My feelings of sexual urges started to manifest of thoughts of preteen girls.

... Wait, what? Just going by the story's twisted logic, wouldn't they be more likely to manifest as desires for older women? [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Quote :

Thoughts varied from infants to teenagers, mostly leaning towards toddlers around 3 and 4.

Author, your pedophilia is showing....

Quote :

I would take walks in parks, pass by elementary schools, and visit public pools just to gaze at young girls. The internet helped pacify the urges for a short time. Then I stumbled upon chat rooms that had people with the same interests. I was on my way.

...To being arrested in a sting operation by a police officer posing as a kid, I hope.

Also, is this a fictional story or an autobiography?

Quote :

I met Molly in a chat room. She was 19 years old.

She was legal, and this made John cry into his pillow for several weeks.

Quote :

Red hair, 36C breasts, 5'3, 120lbs.

I'm not sure why all these details are relevant, but the author apparently feels they are.

Quote :

She was a runaway at the age of 16 when she found out she was pregnant by her father. She was afraid of her dad getting in trouble, so she left. We hit it off from the start, we talked for hours.

About incest, incest, and more incest.

Quote :

Her biggest fantasy dealt with her daughter Paige, being with a loving gentleman, who would make love to her 3 year old daughter.

I... yeah. It's getting pretty much unsporkable, now.

Quote :

She wasn't really sure if she would actually let it happen, but like she said, you never know.

Yeah, child-rape, you know, it's just one of those things you have to schedule in your day planner, next to the grocery shopping and weekly gym visits. Gotta make the time for felonious activities.

Quote :

We made plans to meet for dinner.

Dinner and a rape is the new dinner and a movie, apparently.

Quote :

Friday never came so slowly.

Huh-huh-huh, you said 'came'. Huh-huh.

...Yeah, that's the last time I can make that joke here, just thought I'd take the opportunity.

Quote :

Just the thought of seeing a 3 year old being given a bath by her mom, who had admitted to molesting her daughter, gave me an instant hard on.

*kick's John's hardon several times*

Quote :

I had a raging steel pole in my pants.

Steel can rage? He must be a robot, so is his dick raging against the machine?

Quote :

Molly went to go put something less confining on. Which to my joy, was a satin robe, and nothing else.

"Does that come in matching mom and daughter versions?"

Quote :

I changed into a pair of Sponge Bob boxers.

I would've worn my Mighty Morphin Power Rangers underoos, but those were in the wash.

Quote :

"Are you sure?" I asked. "Just be gentle" she said with a smile that could melt anyone's heart.

Not mine. *readies flamethrower*

After this, the fic starts getting really vile, as the toddler is forced to give John a BJ. And it's all so lovingly and graphically described that, yeah, it is a little frightening. It is noted that Paige gets 'a little scared' during said BJ, but of course that doesn't stop our hero.

*wants to kill something*

The story ends with John screwing the mother, the mother performing oral sex on her daughter, and John 'deflowering' Paige with his finger. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] Since I don't want to stink up New Releases any more with this crap, I'm done.

Quote :

NOTE: More stories like this can be found at:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

NOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!

Ahh, asstr.org. To paraphrase Obi-Wan Kenobi in the original 'Star Wars" "You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villany." Why this site hasn't been closed down by now is beyond me, given the amount of pedophilia-related stories.

Why is it that with all the heights and weights given, that I just had to calculate BMIs? For the record, everyone in the fic is of healthy weight.

Wife has some fucked up proportions though if her chest manages to be 40 inches around--or American bra sizes are different. In the UK, the number denotes under the boobs, and 40DD would therefore be a fat dinnerlady's bra size.

It's sad that this is what I think about when i see child porn.

This is really awful. He keeps reapeating all the way through it that she's only three, like he wants the audience to be constantly aware how grim it is.

ZoZo wrote:

Wife has some fucked up proportions though if her chest manages to be 40 inches around--or American bra sizes are different. In the UK, the number denotes under the boobs, and 40DD would therefore be a fat dinnerlady's bra size.

I'm pretty sure I'm a 36DD. I think the number denotes the fullest part of the bust.

Just informally measuring around my boobs at their bustiest part, I'm currently 41 inches. Around my ribcage, it's 32.5 inches. *shrugs*

ZoZo wrote:

It's sad that this is what I think about when i see child porn.

Better than thinking about what's actually going on in the fic, amirite?

Gotta love the measurements.

It's as if the author was in butcher shop. I want a ham sized 36C, 5'3, 120lbs, please.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] Christ that's vile.

So, we can keep telling one another how awful we think this story is, or we could discuss something a bit more compelling:

Do you think that, because of the content of this story, the author is a pedophile?

People write really fucked up things. Some of the members of this forum have written erotica featuring some pretty disturbing elements like rape. I highly doubt all of them are rapists. But how far is too far? Where are the lines in the sand that determine the difference between somebody writing some really fucked up erotica and someone using their writing to express a genuine desire to do that kind of thing to somebody?

I'm really interested in seeing what you guys make of this.

As someone else pointed out, he seems really obsessed pointing out the fact that the kid is only three, which would seem to imply that that's the best part of it for him--and so yes, I do think he's a pedo.

This is definitely wish fulfillment. My vote is Pedo.

I used to work at a combined psychiatric/neurology clinic as a transcriptionist, and we had one psychologist who specialized in 'treating' pedophiles. I absolutely LOATHED typing up the notes on the sessions, because these guys would go into the sort of explicit detail you generally only find in magazines ordered from online addresses and sent to mailbox addresses.

The fact that he keeps mentioning that the kid's only three and how excited he is by the idea basically screams 'pedophile.'

Narwhal wrote:

So, we can keep telling one another how awful we think this story is, or we could discuss something a bit more compelling:

Do you think that, because of the content of this story, the author is a pedophile?

My short answer: Yes.

My long answer: Yes, I think he is, because, while a story containing something objectionable or vile isn't always an indicator that an author is into that something, it can be, depending on how the content is handled and displayed. Just based on how he's written this, how obsessed the Gary Stu is with incest and violating the little girl character, how the child has been trained from birth to be a sexual servant to her mother and now to the Gary Stu... I dunno, it just gives off really bad, icky vibes.

That being said, if the author is a pedo, he may not be acting on his fantasies, but is writing this sort of stuff really a helpful therapy for it? Somehow I doubt it. RB, can you weigh in on this question?

For the record, I agree with you guys. Pedo. The most repulsive aspect of this story is that he is making a genuine effort to 'de-fang' the situation: The child's parent is aware of, advocates, and participates in the abuse. The encounter is described as "loving/making love" and the pedophile himself is categorized as a "gentleman". At no point does the encounter turn violent, nor does the pedophile want it to. Unlike in real life, his desires are met with approval and, to his belief, do not have negative repercussions on the victim.

This is some pretty fucked up shit.

Narwhal wrote:

For the record, I agree with you guys. Pedo. The most repulsive aspect of this story is that he is making a genuine effort to 'de-fang' the situation: The child's parent is aware of, advocates, and participates in the abuse. The encounter is described as "loving/making love" and the pedophile himself is categorized as a "gentleman". At no point does the encounter turn violent, nor does the pedophile want it to. Unlike in real life, his desires are met with approval and, to his belief, do not have negative repercussions on the victim.

Agreeing with everything except the bolded quotes. The little girl character is scared when 'John' and her mother force her to suck him off; he mentions twice that she's frightened, and that her fear is increasing as he gets closer to climax, but he also says he doesn't care, twice. So, yeah, just like a real abuser, 'John' doesn't care whether his victim feels fear or not; all he wants is what he wants, and to hell with what is good or healthy for the little girl.

And yeah, realistically, this sort of thing would have hugely negative consequences, and I think that the author showed that deep down he recognizes that such behavior does have negative consequences; for example, the girl being afraid during the blowjob, and crying out once in pain when she's being penetrated by the man's finger. However, he doesn't care, obviously. But even in his fantasy, a small shred of highly unpleasant reality manages to impress itself.

Well, we consider those things to be excruciatingly terrible, but I was making the point that causing intentional physical harm to the child isn't what's getting him off. He seems to have this creepy obsession with making things "pleasant" for the child. During the blowjob scene he tries to be careful not to gag her. When he does ignore her fear in favor of his own release, it's excused by the fact that he was "too far gone to care". When he deflowers the poor child he kisses her to try and "calm" her "as best he could".

Jesus. D:

Narwhal wrote:

Well, we consider those things to be excruciatingly terrible, but I was making the point that causing intentional physical harm to the child isn't what's getting him off.

Aahh, I see what you mean...

Narwhal wrote:

He seems to have this creepy obsession with making things "pleasant" for the child. During the blowjob scene he tries to be careful not to gag her. When he does ignore her fear in favor of his own release, it's excused by the fact that he was "too far gone to care". When he deflowers the poor child he kisses her to try and "calm" her "as best he could".

Jesus.

Yeah, I'd forgotten those parts. Though I think he's just trying to 'make' her comfortable as a way of salving whatever remains of his conscience, and make it seem like what he's doing isn't ALL that bad. He doesn't care enough about her to actually stop what he's doing, of course.

Yeah, pedos really seem to think that their perversions are in the child's best interest. I've spoken to pedos--online, thankfully; face-to-face I'd have probably punched them--who go on and on about how molestation is their way of 'showing their love for the child' and how kiddy porn shows children who love to have sex* and are not in any way being exploited and abused--or even worse, that abuse is a good thing!

Yes, there are actually people who think like that. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]


*Some freak tried to argue exactly this. Think about that for a moment. How wrapped up in your own self-delusion to you have to be to believe such a thing?

Malganis wrote:

Narwhal wrote:

So, we can keep telling one another how awful we think this story is, or we could discuss something a bit more compelling:

Do you think that, because of the content of this story, the author is a pedophile?

My short answer: Yes.

My long answer: Yes, I think he is, because, while a story containing something objectionable or vile isn't always an indicator that an author is into that something, it can be, depending on how the content is handled and displayed. Just based on how he's written this, how obsessed the Gary Stu is with incest and violating the little girl character, how the child has been trained from birth to be a sexual servant to her mother and now to the Gary Stu... I dunno, it just gives off really bad, icky vibes.

That being said, if the author is a pedo, he may not be acting on his fantasies, but is writing this sort of stuff really a helpful therapy for it? Somehow I doubt it. RB, can you weigh in on this question?

From what I learned working at the clinic, pedophiliac behavior is directly tied in with child pornography (either written or visual). It's why they hate to get sent to jail so bad-they won't let you read that kind've shit in prison.

And no, writing it down is not in any way therapeutic. The psychologist I mentioned was attempting to figure out a way to possibly, if not cure pedophiles, at least to alter their behavior. So he encouraged them to write down their fantasies, or tell him about them. In no case did this cause a lack of desire; if anything, it just sexually excited them further.

Pedophiles have no moral limits. In all the years science has been working on this question, no one's ever come up with a reason why. Some of them were sexually and physically abused as children, but an equal number weren't. They're extremely selfish individuals who don't care who they hurt or what sort of havoc they leave in their wake. To them, all that matters is that they get what they want (i.e., to bang little kids). I once typed up notes for a pedophile who had raped his girlfriend's year old daughter and said it was the child's fault because 'she was coming on to me.' Of course, she wasn't. She was acting like a little kid, and he was interpreting perfectly normal behavior for a child that age (i.e., liking to sometimes run around naked because it's fun) as being sexual.

I, personally, think pedophiles are the scum of the earth, and that either chemical castration or being jailed for the rest of their rotten lives are the only way to keep them from doing more damage. They can't change, and even if they did, there's no evidence that therapy or any sort of medication will stop their behavior. The only thing they ever feel remorse over is getting caught. They sure's hell don't care about the countless kids who've had their childhood's stolen from them.

... which is why I don't think we should waste money on therapy or rehabilitation for any of them. I'm not saying they should all be round up and shot, but just focus on getting them the fuck off the streets.

P.S. Who else wants to pick Rabid Badger's brain? I do.

ZoZo wrote:

Why is it that with all the heights and weights given, that I just had to calculate BMIs? For the record, everyone in the fic is of healthy weight.

...

It's sad that this is what I think about when i see child porn.

:roflmao:

ZoZo, I think I'm in love with you :>

(on a lighter note considering that there are scumbags who actually write this kind of shit--Hey, at least I can get enjoyment out of something about this fic.)

The pedo thing is disgusting, so I'll just address the bra sizes. Basically, band size is your under-bust measurement in inches, add four inches, then round up to nearest even size. Cup size is the difference between that number and your measurment across the nipple line, with one inch per cup size. Of course, that gets wonky when you get over a D, so it's still all screwy.

Quote :

Wife has some fucked up proportions though if her chest manages to be 40 inches around--or American bra sizes are different. In the UK, the number denotes under the boobs, and 40DD would therefore be a fat dinnerlady's bra size.

I'll focus on this because I can't stomach the rest of this (oh God please let it be only) "fiction".

Yeah, for her weight and everything, she really shouldn't be a 40DD. o.O I'm a good deal over-weight, and I'm a 38DD. So unless she has some crazy ribcage-thing happening there, a woman of that size shouldn't be a 40...

But then again, this is written by a pedo. Considering the ages of the kids he's going after, it's unlikely he knows anything about the bra measurements of healthy, adult, women. Maybe his obsession with height/weight/boob size in this story is to show "No REALLY! I mostly like adults!". [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Just to add what has already been said about bra sizes: Most badfic writers, especially those who have never taken a bra off a woman, let alone know how the weird sizing works, seem to think along the lines that "The bigger the number the bigger the tits!". Yes, this is true, but that's because the woman is bigger all around.

So, yeah. In the US, the band size refers to (but isn't actually) the circumference under the breasts. A bigger size means that the woman's frame is bigger overall, while a smaller size is for those who are more slender. Since others have given examples, I have two of my own: I'm 5'1", 105 pounds, and my bra size is 32B. My girlfriend is about 140 pounds, is 5'5", and she wears a 38DD. There are numerous online calculators devoted to finding the right bra size, which basically boils down to the difference of the circumference of the breasts to the circumference of the ribs.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] In summary, it's impossible for the waifs these writers fantasize about to have the bra sizes they give to them, unless their rib cages are twice the size of the rest of their body.

(Although I would be interested in a drawing of such. For lulz.)

A friend of a friend claims she is a 28F.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't the laws of physics dictate that she should be continually FALLING ON HER FACE if this were so?

Fitchsticks wrote:

A friend of a friend claims she is a 28F.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't the laws of physics dictate that she should be continually FALLING ON HER FACE if this were so?

If it's UK sizes, that's perfectly physically possible (although a tad on the large side). The letter is entirely dependent on the back size, so a 28F would be equal to a 32D. Most women actually wear their bras too small in the cups and too large in the back. I found this out after I'd spent years in a 36DD and finally got fitted and discovered I'm actually a 32G. I do fall on my face constantly, but I suspect this is more to do with clumsiness than having large circus-sized jubblies.