Free Birth Control For All!

grmblfjx wrote:

rae wrote:

"WHY NOT?! DON'T YOU WANT KIDS?!"

Clearly, the correct answer is, "I love kids, especially with a dry red, but who grows their own food anymore?"

Or...

"Sorry, but our neighborhood isn't zoned for goats."

Holy crap, guys! Rep. Steve King has just made me aware of something that could reverse my position on this whole thing!

Quote :

"They've called it preventative medicine. Preventative medicine. Well if you applied that preventative medicine universally what you end up with is you've prevented a generation.

"Preventing babies from being born is not medicine. That's not — that's not constructive to our culture and our civilization. If we let our birth rate get down below replacement rate we're a dying civilization."

HOLY SHIT! IF EVERYONE HAS ACCESS TO CONTRACEPTION THEN PEOPLE WILL STOP HAVING CHILDREN! AND CIVILISATION WILL DIE!

A link
Another link

WD40 wrote:

HOLY SHIT! IF EVERYONE HAS ACCESS TO CONTRACEPTION THEN PEOPLE WILL STOP HAVING CHILDREN! AND CIVILISATION WILL DIE!

No, that actually seems somewhat true. Germany (at least, I think this is kinda common in western Europe) is trying to come up with schemes to make people have enough babies, because we aren't.

Of course, contraception is not the only factor in this (culture and education being equally important), but it is one.

Why does America need so many babies anyway?

Oh, I know! Soylent Baby!

You need enough young people to enter the workforce and contribute to the economy to keep it running. A nation that's mostly senior citizens can't do jack shit.

What I love is how Ms. Pearl-Clutcher is freaking out about encouraging female promiscuity. Not a word about men, because Men Must Fuck, and who cares if they have eleven children by six different mothers and never pay a red cent in child support for any of them?

No, Cy, you must praise them, because that's another eleven eggs that didn't have to go down the drain unfertilized.

grmblfjx wrote:

WD40 wrote:

HOLY SHIT! IF EVERYONE HAS ACCESS TO CONTRACEPTION THEN PEOPLE WILL STOP HAVING CHILDREN! AND CIVILISATION WILL DIE!

No, that actually seems somewhat true. Germany (at least, I think this is kinda common in western Europe) is trying to come up with schemes to make people have enough babies, because we aren't.

Of course, contraception is not the only factor in this (culture and education being equally important), but it is one.

I just read a German article where the writer was positively *giddy* that there are now enough kita ("child daycare") places to cover 23% of demand, up from 14% (while also stating that, in the area observed, fewer children had been born, which indicates to me that there aren't more kita spots, just fewer childen). Considering that nowadays, more often than not, two people in a family with child have to work in order to be able to pay the bills, that's a huge part of the problem right there.

Wulf: In what kind of whoring whoreland do you live? THIS IS MURICA, WHERE OUR WOMEN ARE ~*~PURE~*~ AND ONLY GET TO HAVE SEX TO HAVE BAYBEEZ!

Fucking faux Victorians, can they all die off already with their stupid Madonna/Whore bullshit?

Saleha wrote:

("child daycare")(...) that's a huge part of the problem right there.

Yeeeah, see, the schemes so far involve a) giving people more money and b) talking about more daycare places.

I just can't leave this thing alone...

Today's women-hater: Sean Hannity.



The question put to him is: "Why should we [via insurance policies] pay for Viagra? [And not get birth control]"

The answer:

Quote :

That is a `medical problem versus a choice to have sex.

When women require birth control they are choosing to have sex. But when a man can't get a boner, it's a medical problem. Why the fuck is that? Why the hell else do you need a hard-on? I can tell you right now, it's no good when you need a piss.

See.

Women choosing to have sex = a problem.
Men not able to have sex when they choose = a problem.

There are other problems that can be treated with Viagra. But there are also other uses for birth control, soooooo yeah. Still dumb.

Penguin wrote:

There are other problems that can be treated with Viagra.

Well yeah, a boner is for nonsexual purposes as well... like it's the first part of a man's body to say "good morning" to him. A man just can't start the day off right without a powerful erection.

Eeveegou wrote:

Penguin wrote:

There are other problems that can be treated with Viagra.

Well yeah, a boner is for nonsexual purposes as well... like it's the first part of a man's body to say "good morning" to him. A man just can't start the day off right without a powerful erection.

Without a boner to lift my comfy, warm blankets off my body in the morning, I'd likely sleep all day. Thank you, boner, for allowing me to get to where I need to go, whether it's school, work, the odd late-night grocery store trip, the laundromat with complementary coffee, or inside some cozy orifice. Also thanks for holding the loofah while I was washing my hair.

WD40 wrote:

Women choosing to have sex = a problem.
Men not able to have sex when they choose = a problem.

Hmm...

So...women aren't supposed to choose to have sex. But...real men need to have lots of sex.



So...who are these real men supposed to be having sex with?

Lady Anne wrote:

So...who are these real men supposed to be having sex with?

I see your and raise you a

WD40 wrote:

Lady Anne wrote:

So...who are these real men supposed to be having sex with?

I see your and raise you a

What's with the "digging up the dirt" on the male prostitute at the end? As if there's some deeper story beyond "he's a gay prostitute, here's his gay prostitute profile."

And yes, he probably should delete his profile, since your article named his name so clearly, and he has no way to defend himself against any hate-crimes now. Why not just give out his address and a few blunt objects?

Sakurelf wrote:

WD40 wrote:

Lady Anne wrote:

So...who are these real men supposed to be having sex with?

I see your and raise you a

What's with the "digging up the dirt" on the male prostitute at the end? As if there's some deeper story beyond "he's a gay prostitute, here's his gay prostitute profile."

And yes, he probably should delete his profile, since your article named his name so clearly, and he has no way to defend himself against any hate-crimes now. Why not just give out his address and a few blunt objects?

I'd say something about "Being a Republican politician prone to loud homphobia is becoming a new gay stereotype", but Ruben Bolling said it better almost four years ago:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]