Woman sues P Diddy for $1 trillion dollars

This makes absolutely no sense.

Quote :

In what could be the weirdest celebrity court battle ever, an american woman is suing P Diddy for $1 trillion (£635 billion). But wait, that’s not all. She has also claimed that the rapper was responsible for the 2001 September 11th attacks.

Confused yet? It gets better.

Valerie Joyce Wilson Turks, has filed the suit in Los Angeles Superior Court against the rap legend, his former girlfriend Kim Porter and Rodney King, the man who was a victim of assault by the Los Angeles Police in 1991.

She also claims that she and the Coming Home singer have a 23 year old son together, Cornelius Wilson.

Turks also alleges that Diddy, real name Sean Combs, caused the 9/11 attacks, put her son in hospital and sold a poker chip belonging to her, which she says was worth "100 zillions of dollars".

I had a good laugh when I saw this today, but then I realised that this meant the courts have actually given their time to this crazy person.
Just... why?

I want to see this case proceed to trial and broadcast on TruTV. It would be the best tv ever.

Wow. Insane Troll Logic in a real life situation. How do you even construct a counter-argument to something that makes so little sense?

My mind is blown.

And thanks to Google, here are the papers.

Man, it's full of crazy...

It probably is a waste of public money giving time to this case, but then chances are they just want to see it go ahead for the lulz. I would.

WD40 wrote:

And thanks to Google, here are the papers.

Man, it's full of crazy...

You ain't kiddin', brother. If crazy were oil, Valerie Turks would be Saudi Arabia.

And after she gets her rear end handed to her she could be sued for filing a frivolous law suit.

Wouldn't it make more sense for the court to just dismiss her suit and be done with it?

KJM wrote:

Wouldn't it make more sense for the court to just dismiss her suit and be done with it?

Don't they have to hear it before they can dismiss it?

Clearly the woman is ignorant of DNA testing to check whose father the boy is, or that would at least be ONE claim she wouldn't bother to make.

KJM wrote:

Wouldn't it make more sense for the court to just dismiss her suit and be done with it?

Indeed it would, but common sense is a commodity that's in short supply in most courtrooms these days.

on the bright side at lest she's really up-ing(one word or two?) the whole gold-digger thing


congrats P Diddy its a crazy RL troll

I suppose somebody convinced the crazy woman that if there was even the fraction of the chance of her getting a settlement for a few hundred thousand dollars, she thought it was a good idea to irritate somebody rich.

And if I were him, I'd call her out on it and watch the bitch squirm and pay legal fees.

KJM wrote:

Wouldn't it make more sense for the court to just dismiss her suit and be done with it?

The courts have to hear the claim before they can dismiss. The real question here is "Who filed the suit in the first place?" Either Little Miss Crazypants filed herself or there's a lawyer about to get his ears boxed (by the judge, the state Bar or both) for taking this case.

I actually haven't gotten past the poker chip worth 100 zillions of dollars. What kind of lawyer would actually go along with this? Someone absurdly bored?

A lawyer who hoped to make a quick 5 grand or what have you when Diddy's lawyers shelled out to make this go away quckly without fuss.

This lady has got to be suffering paranoid delusions, or she's blowing his music videos way out of proportion.